A comparison of engagement and interaction among university distance learning students

Samantha Tackett, K. Torres
{"title":"A comparison of engagement and interaction among university distance learning students","authors":"Samantha Tackett, K. Torres","doi":"10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.063387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When facilitating instruction in distance learning environments, educators are presented with challenges in student motivation and development of community. We used a mixed-method approach to analyse the interaction patterns and quality of discussion among distance learning college students who used two different course tools to complete assignments. Six patterns of discussion emerged from the posts: agreement, disagreement, countering, belief, statement, and re-state. We used a five-point scale to assess the quality of students’ posts. The student posts from VoiceThread™ (VT) assignments had higher quality scores and higher frequency of countering and belief statements. Whereas, the student posts from discussion board (DB) assignments had lower quality scores and a higher frequency of re-statement and agree statements. Student feedback regarding the use of the VT tool was positive. Additional analysis of using the VT tool with different types of assignments and in other online courses is necessary.","PeriodicalId":275398,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.063387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When facilitating instruction in distance learning environments, educators are presented with challenges in student motivation and development of community. We used a mixed-method approach to analyse the interaction patterns and quality of discussion among distance learning college students who used two different course tools to complete assignments. Six patterns of discussion emerged from the posts: agreement, disagreement, countering, belief, statement, and re-state. We used a five-point scale to assess the quality of students’ posts. The student posts from VoiceThread™ (VT) assignments had higher quality scores and higher frequency of countering and belief statements. Whereas, the student posts from discussion board (DB) assignments had lower quality scores and a higher frequency of re-statement and agree statements. Student feedback regarding the use of the VT tool was positive. Additional analysis of using the VT tool with different types of assignments and in other online courses is necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学远程教育学生的投入与互动比较
在促进远程教育环境下的教学时,教育者面临着学生动机和社区发展的挑战。我们使用混合方法来分析使用两种不同课程工具完成作业的远程学习大学生之间的互动模式和讨论质量。帖子中出现了六种讨论模式:同意、不同意、反驳、相信、陈述和重新陈述。我们使用五分制来评估学生帖子的质量。来自VoiceThread™(VT)作业的学生帖子具有更高的质量分数和更高的反驳和信念陈述频率。然而,来自讨论板(DB)作业的学生帖子的质量分数较低,重复陈述和同意陈述的频率较高。学生对虚拟教学工具的使用反馈是积极的。在不同类型的作业和其他在线课程中使用VT工具的额外分析是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to change the world: the relationship between social media and social change in the classroom Learning ecologies in online language learning social networks: a netnographic study of EFL learners using italki Most versus least used social media: undergraduate students' preferences, participation, lurking, and motivational factors Star Wars science on social media! Using pop culture to improve STEM skills Applying a modified technology acceptance model to qualitatively analyse the factors affecting microblogging integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1