Korean Industrialization, Skill Demand, and Wage Premium

Changkeun Lee
{"title":"Korean Industrialization, Skill Demand, and Wage Premium","authors":"Changkeun Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3693517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to observe the evolution of skilled labor demand and relative wages during the rapid industrialization period. Although this historic episode has attracted the researchers’ attention, the evolution of skill demand and its impact on inequality remained as a black box. To provide first-hand evidence, I construct a 3-digit industry-level dataset that covers 1955-1980 from the Mining and Manufacturing survey. Then I measure skill demand and relative wages following the skill-biased technological change literature.<br><br>Analysis results show that Korea experiences drastic skill upgrading during its rapid industrialization. The nonproduction workers’ share in wage bill increased throughout the 25 years of 1955-1980. Relative demand rose much faster in industries that were initially less skill-intensive but accumulated capital through investment faster. This implies that there was a strong skill-capital complementarity.<br> Increasing skill demand and skill-capital complementarity are a force of increasing skill premium in wages and wage inequality. It was so until 1973.<br><br>However, since then relative wages fell while skill demand kept rising. This is unique to the Korean experience, It also implies that the supply of skilled labor expanded even faster than the skill demand. Although it is possible to connect this to the heavy-chemical industrialization, falling skill premium and inequality was most driven by the “within” or common effect. Furthermore, emerging heavy-chemical industries had greater skill demand, therefore a positive effect on relative wage.<br>","PeriodicalId":210669,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to observe the evolution of skilled labor demand and relative wages during the rapid industrialization period. Although this historic episode has attracted the researchers’ attention, the evolution of skill demand and its impact on inequality remained as a black box. To provide first-hand evidence, I construct a 3-digit industry-level dataset that covers 1955-1980 from the Mining and Manufacturing survey. Then I measure skill demand and relative wages following the skill-biased technological change literature.

Analysis results show that Korea experiences drastic skill upgrading during its rapid industrialization. The nonproduction workers’ share in wage bill increased throughout the 25 years of 1955-1980. Relative demand rose much faster in industries that were initially less skill-intensive but accumulated capital through investment faster. This implies that there was a strong skill-capital complementarity.
Increasing skill demand and skill-capital complementarity are a force of increasing skill premium in wages and wage inequality. It was so until 1973.

However, since then relative wages fell while skill demand kept rising. This is unique to the Korean experience, It also implies that the supply of skilled labor expanded even faster than the skill demand. Although it is possible to connect this to the heavy-chemical industrialization, falling skill premium and inequality was most driven by the “within” or common effect. Furthermore, emerging heavy-chemical industries had greater skill demand, therefore a positive effect on relative wage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国产业化、技能需求与工资溢价
本文旨在观察快速工业化时期熟练劳动力需求和相对工资的演变。尽管这一历史事件引起了研究人员的注意,但技能需求的演变及其对不平等的影响仍然是一个黑盒子。为了提供第一手证据,我从采矿和制造业调查中构建了一个3位数的行业数据集,涵盖了1955-1980年。然后,我根据技能偏向的技术变革文献测量技能需求和相对工资。分析结果表明,韩国在快速工业化过程中经历了激烈的技能升级。非生产工人在工资账单中的份额在1955年至1980年的25年间不断增加。在那些最初技能密集程度较低但通过投资积累资本的行业,相对需求增长得快得多。这意味着有很强的技能和资本的互补性。不断增加的技能需求和技能资本互补性是工资技能溢价和工资不平等加剧的力量。直到1973年。然而,自那以来,相对工资下降,而技能需求持续上升。这是韩国独有的经验。这也意味着熟练劳动力的供给比熟练劳动力的需求增长得更快。虽然这可能与重化学工业化联系起来,但技能溢价和不平等的下降主要是由“内部”或共同效应驱动的。此外,新兴的重化工行业对技能的需求更大,因此对相对工资有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gender Pay Gap in the Public Sector: Evidence from the Canadian Labour Force Survey Gender Differences in Reactions to Failure in High-Stakes Competition: Evidence from the National College Entrance Exam Retakes Non-compete Agreements, Wages and Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from Brazilian Football What Drives the Finance Academia Wage Premium? How Does Technical Change Affect Worker Productivity in a Multiple-Task Environment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1