Lloyd v. Google LLC, and How Australia Is Tackling Privacy and Data Breach Litigation

Amy Cooper-Boast, Brooke Hall-Carney
{"title":"Lloyd v. Google LLC, and How Australia Is Tackling Privacy and Data Breach Litigation","authors":"Amy Cooper-Boast, Brooke Hall-Carney","doi":"10.54648/gplr2022020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The much-anticipated judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Lloyd v. Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50; [2021] 3 WLR 1268 was handed down in November 2021. The decision challenges the notion that one’s data and its loss of control has an inherent value which is actionable in its own right. It is welcomed by Big Tech, other organizations that control data, and their insurers. The decision is a key case in the broader landscape of accountability of technology companies and is indicative of the disparity in data protection and privacy rights across different jurisdictions. This case note examines the key points arising from the case, and the comparable landscape for privacy and data breach litigation in Australia.\nLloyd v. Google, Google, Privacy, Data Breach, Data Protection, Litigation, Australia, United Kingdom, Class Action","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2022020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The much-anticipated judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Lloyd v. Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50; [2021] 3 WLR 1268 was handed down in November 2021. The decision challenges the notion that one’s data and its loss of control has an inherent value which is actionable in its own right. It is welcomed by Big Tech, other organizations that control data, and their insurers. The decision is a key case in the broader landscape of accountability of technology companies and is indicative of the disparity in data protection and privacy rights across different jurisdictions. This case note examines the key points arising from the case, and the comparable landscape for privacy and data breach litigation in Australia. Lloyd v. Google, Google, Privacy, Data Breach, Data Protection, Litigation, Australia, United Kingdom, Class Action
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳埃德诉谷歌有限责任公司,以及澳大利亚如何处理隐私和数据泄露诉讼
备受期待的英国最高法院Lloyd诉Google LLC案判决[2021]UKSC 50;[2021] 3 WLR 1268于2021年11月交付。这一决定挑战了这样一种观念,即一个人的数据及其失去控制具有内在价值,这种价值本身就是可操作的。它受到大型科技公司、其他控制数据的组织及其保险公司的欢迎。这一决定是科技公司问责制大环境中的一个关键案例,表明不同司法管辖区在数据保护和隐私权方面存在差异。本案例说明考察了该案件产生的关键点,以及澳大利亚隐私和数据泄露诉讼的可比景观。劳埃德诉谷歌,谷歌,隐私,数据泄露,数据保护,诉讼,澳大利亚,英国,集体诉讼
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Key Privacy Concepts in the EU and Canada The Personal Data Under the GDPR: Concept, Elements, and Boundaries News: APAC Privacy News Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law Case Note: Strengthening the Role of Google? Recent Developments in the Right to Be Forgotten Case Law of the CJEU (TU and RE v. Google LLC, C-460/20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1