A Question of Justiciability: Did the Prime Minister Misdirect Himself as to the Meaning of Bullying Within the Ministerial Code? R (FDA) v The Prime Minister and Minister for the Civil Service [2021] EWHC 3279 (Admin)

C. Monaghan
{"title":"A Question of Justiciability: Did the Prime Minister Misdirect Himself as to the Meaning of Bullying Within the Ministerial Code? R (FDA) v The Prime Minister and Minister for the Civil Service [2021] EWHC 3279 (Admin)","authors":"C. Monaghan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2154463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. This article considers the decision of the Divisional Court in R (FDA) v The Prime Minister and Minister for the Civil Service, where the Court had to decide whether the question of whether the Prime Minister had misdirected himself as to the meaning of ‘bullying’ within the Ministerial Code was justiciable and, if so, whether the Prime Minister had in fact misdirected himself. The Court was comprised of Lewis LJ and Steyn J.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2154463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. This article considers the decision of the Divisional Court in R (FDA) v The Prime Minister and Minister for the Civil Service, where the Court had to decide whether the question of whether the Prime Minister had misdirected himself as to the meaning of ‘bullying’ within the Ministerial Code was justiciable and, if so, whether the Prime Minister had in fact misdirected himself. The Court was comprised of Lewis LJ and Steyn J.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个可诉性问题:总理是否在部长法典中误导了自己对欺凌的理解?R (FDA)诉总理和公务员部长[2021]EWHC 3279(行政)
1. 本文考虑了地方法院在R (FDA) v总理和公务员部长案中的决定,法院必须决定总理是否在部长法典中对“欺凌”的含义进行了误导的问题是否可以审理,如果可以,总理是否实际上误导了自己。法院由刘易斯·LJ和斯泰恩·J组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1