Characteristics of Triple Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Single Center Experience

J. Morena, B. Jiang, M. Freimer, J. Hoyle, Bakri H. Elsheikh, D. Arnold, S. Lorusso
{"title":"Characteristics of Triple Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Single Center Experience","authors":"J. Morena, B. Jiang, M. Freimer, J. Hoyle, Bakri H. Elsheikh, D. Arnold, S. Lorusso","doi":"10.17161/rrnmf.v3i1.14989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is variability in the literature regarding the characteristics of triple seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG) patients. Most studies were performed before LRP4 antibodies were discovered, and characterizations of triple seronegative patients are lacking in the literature. \nMethods: We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed with myasthenia gravis (MG) at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2019. Triple SNMG was defined by a history and examination that was consistent with MG and positive SFEMG, RNS or edrophonium testing, but negative serology for AChR, MUSK, and LRP4 antibodies. \nResults: A total of 210 AChR+, 9 MuSK+, 6 LRP4+, 9 double SNMG, and 21 triple SNMG patients were reviewed. Triple SNMG patients required significantly fewer immunosuppressive agents compared with AChR+ patients (p=0.0001) and a trend towards a less frequent history of hospitalizations, myasthenic crises and intubations compared to all antibody positive groups. Triple SNMG patients had a significantly higher frequency of ocular disease (33%) compared to AChR+ patients (13%) (p=0.0250). One triple and one double SNMG patient had thymic hyperplasia and improved after thymectomy. 11 triple SNMG patients had negative genetic testing for CMS. \nConclusion: Our results further elucidate the clinical characteristics of triple SNMG, which include the predominance for ocular disease and a less severe disease course. Although likely rare, investigation for thymic pathology should be a consideration even in SNMG, and thymectomy should be considered when there is thymic pathology. We did not find alternate diagnoses in SNMG patients and thus ancillary testing should be considered in carefully selected patients for cost-effective care.","PeriodicalId":309700,"journal":{"name":"RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/rrnmf.v3i1.14989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is variability in the literature regarding the characteristics of triple seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG) patients. Most studies were performed before LRP4 antibodies were discovered, and characterizations of triple seronegative patients are lacking in the literature. Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed with myasthenia gravis (MG) at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2019. Triple SNMG was defined by a history and examination that was consistent with MG and positive SFEMG, RNS or edrophonium testing, but negative serology for AChR, MUSK, and LRP4 antibodies. Results: A total of 210 AChR+, 9 MuSK+, 6 LRP4+, 9 double SNMG, and 21 triple SNMG patients were reviewed. Triple SNMG patients required significantly fewer immunosuppressive agents compared with AChR+ patients (p=0.0001) and a trend towards a less frequent history of hospitalizations, myasthenic crises and intubations compared to all antibody positive groups. Triple SNMG patients had a significantly higher frequency of ocular disease (33%) compared to AChR+ patients (13%) (p=0.0250). One triple and one double SNMG patient had thymic hyperplasia and improved after thymectomy. 11 triple SNMG patients had negative genetic testing for CMS. Conclusion: Our results further elucidate the clinical characteristics of triple SNMG, which include the predominance for ocular disease and a less severe disease course. Although likely rare, investigation for thymic pathology should be a consideration even in SNMG, and thymectomy should be considered when there is thymic pathology. We did not find alternate diagnoses in SNMG patients and thus ancillary testing should be considered in carefully selected patients for cost-effective care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三重血清阴性重症肌无力的特征:单中心经验
背景:关于三重血清阴性重症肌无力(SNMG)患者的特征在文献中存在差异。大多数研究是在LRP4抗体被发现之前进行的,文献中缺乏对三血清阴性患者的描述。方法:回顾性调查2009年至2019年俄亥俄州立大学诊断为重症肌无力(MG)的患者。三重SNMG的定义是病史和检查与MG和阳性SFEMG、RNS或edrophonium检测一致,但AChR、MUSK和LRP4抗体的血清学阴性。结果:共回顾了210例AChR+、9例MuSK+、6例LRP4+、9例双SNMG、21例三SNMG患者。与AChR阳性患者相比,三重SNMG患者需要的免疫抑制剂明显减少(p=0.0001),并且与所有抗体阳性组相比,住院史、肌无力危象和插管的频率更低。与AChR+患者(13%)相比,三重SNMG患者的眼部疾病发生率(33%)显著高于AChR+患者(13%)(p=0.0250)。1例三期和1例双期SNMG患者胸腺增生,胸腺切除术后有所改善。11例三联SNMG患者CMS基因检测阴性。结论:我们的结果进一步阐明了三重SNMG的临床特点,以眼部疾病为主,病程较轻。虽然可能罕见,但即使在SNMG中也应考虑胸腺病理检查,当有胸腺病理时应考虑胸腺切除术。我们没有在SNMG患者中发现替代诊断,因此在精心挑选的患者中应该考虑辅助检测以获得成本效益的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Survival and multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinic care at a United States Veterans Affairs medical center Recurrent Guillian Barre’ Syndrome vs acute onset CIDP - study of 2 cases. Rhabdomyolysis and Exercise Intolerance in a 45-Year-Old Man A Worsening Problem in ALS: Insurance Barriers Between Drug Approvals and Patient Access Safety and tolerability of phenylbutyrate in inclusion body myositis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1