Is It True Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Harvest for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Increase the Risk of Mediastinitis

E. Hijazi
{"title":"Is It True Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Harvest for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Increase the Risk of Mediastinitis","authors":"E. Hijazi","doi":"10.5580/e2b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: The single internal thoracic artery (SITA) has been used almost exclusively as a pedicled graft. Many publications report that bilateral pedicled internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting increases the risk of mediastinitis. Recently in order to gain the additional length, increase the number of arterial anastomoses and decrease the occurrence of deep sternal infections, there has been an increasing popularity of bilateral use of the skeletonized internal thoracic artery (ITA) for CABG. The aim of this article is to review English literature from multicenter and different cardiac surgeon's experiences regarding this fact. We used terms bilateral mammary harvesting, harvesting of bilateral mammary, mediastinitis and related keywords to search MEDLINE, other literature databases and article reference lists for English-language single versus bilateral internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting that were published from 1990 – December, 2007. Current available evidence shows that skeletonized BITA grafting carries an acceptable risk of deep sternal infection but is not recommended for repeat CABG or for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Skeletonized BITA grafting can be safely applied in almost every patient. All cardiac surgeons should be trained efficiently in using skeletonized BITA.","PeriodicalId":330833,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/e2b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: The single internal thoracic artery (SITA) has been used almost exclusively as a pedicled graft. Many publications report that bilateral pedicled internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting increases the risk of mediastinitis. Recently in order to gain the additional length, increase the number of arterial anastomoses and decrease the occurrence of deep sternal infections, there has been an increasing popularity of bilateral use of the skeletonized internal thoracic artery (ITA) for CABG. The aim of this article is to review English literature from multicenter and different cardiac surgeon's experiences regarding this fact. We used terms bilateral mammary harvesting, harvesting of bilateral mammary, mediastinitis and related keywords to search MEDLINE, other literature databases and article reference lists for English-language single versus bilateral internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting that were published from 1990 – December, 2007. Current available evidence shows that skeletonized BITA grafting carries an acceptable risk of deep sternal infection but is not recommended for repeat CABG or for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Skeletonized BITA grafting can be safely applied in almost every patient. All cardiac surgeons should be trained efficiently in using skeletonized BITA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉旁路移植术中切除双侧胸内动脉真的会增加纵隔炎的风险吗
摘要:单胸内动脉(SITA)几乎完全被用作带蒂移植物。许多出版物报道双侧带蒂胸椎内动脉(ITA)移植术增加了纵隔炎的风险。近年来,为了获得额外的长度,增加动脉吻合口的数量和减少胸骨深部感染的发生,双侧使用骨化胸内动脉(ITA)进行CABG越来越受欢迎。本文的目的是回顾多中心和不同心脏外科医生在这方面的经验的英文文献。我们使用术语双侧乳腺切除、双侧乳腺切除、纵隔炎及相关关键词检索MEDLINE、其他文献数据库和发表于1990年至2007年12月的英文单侧与双侧乳腺内动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术的文章参考列表。现有证据表明,骨化BITA移植具有可接受的胸骨深部感染风险,但不推荐用于重复CABG或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。骨化BITA移植几乎可以安全地应用于所有患者。所有的心脏外科医生都应该接受有效的培训,学会使用骨架式BITA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Spontaneously Reverted After Surgery. A Giant Pseudo Aneurysm Of The Left Ventricle Revealed By Hematemesis. A Case of Commotio Cordis Caused by Horse Kick Impacted Table Spoon In The Oesophagus Complicating Emergency Domestic Management Of Epilepsy Non-Operative Management Of Chest Tube Induced Pulmonary Artery Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1