Photogrammetric analysis of postextraction space closure

Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, Marijana Arapović-Savić, Adriana Arbutina, Tijana Adamović, Igor Djukic
{"title":"Photogrammetric analysis of postextraction space closure","authors":"Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, Marijana Arapović-Savić, Adriana Arbutina, Tijana Adamović, Igor Djukic","doi":"10.2298/sgs2102059u","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. When planning orthodontic treatment, it is sometimes necessary\n to apply the extraction of individual teeth, in order to achieve proper\n occlusion and an acceptable aesthetic appearance. Clinicians give the\n greatest advantage to elastic chains as a method for post-extraction space\n closure during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. When closing\n post-extraction spaces, it is necessary to measure them in order to adjust\n the treatment plan. One of the most acceptable methods is photogrammetry.\n The aim of this study was to analyze, using a photogrammetric method, the\n efficacy of post-extraction space closure with elastic chains during\n orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Material and\n Methods. The total sample in study consisted of 38 post-extraction spaces in\n 19 patients who were indicated for first premolars extraction and use of\n fixed orthodontic appliances in order to achieve treatment goal. Elastic\n chains were used to close post-extraction spaces. Post-extraction sites were\n monitored for 6 months with follow-up examinations every 4 weeks. Mechanisms\n were activated at controlled examinations, and measurements of the width of\n post-extraction spaces were performed by photogrammetry and digital caliper.\n Results. The results showed that average reduction of post-extraction space\n width was 1.00 mm per month by photogrammetric measurement, while the\n average values of measurements with a digital caliper were 1.02 mm. The\n average values were measured in six time intervals and a statistically\n significant change in average intervals of post-extraction spaces during 6\n months was determined. Conclusion. The elastic chain has proven to be a very\n effective mechanism for closing post-extraction space, and photogrammetry as\n a simple and precise method for monitoring results of treatment. Since the\n difference in relation to measurements with a digital caliper is minimal,\n photogrammetry can be routinely applied in everyday practice.","PeriodicalId":180624,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Dental Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2102059u","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. When planning orthodontic treatment, it is sometimes necessary to apply the extraction of individual teeth, in order to achieve proper occlusion and an acceptable aesthetic appearance. Clinicians give the greatest advantage to elastic chains as a method for post-extraction space closure during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. When closing post-extraction spaces, it is necessary to measure them in order to adjust the treatment plan. One of the most acceptable methods is photogrammetry. The aim of this study was to analyze, using a photogrammetric method, the efficacy of post-extraction space closure with elastic chains during orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Material and Methods. The total sample in study consisted of 38 post-extraction spaces in 19 patients who were indicated for first premolars extraction and use of fixed orthodontic appliances in order to achieve treatment goal. Elastic chains were used to close post-extraction spaces. Post-extraction sites were monitored for 6 months with follow-up examinations every 4 weeks. Mechanisms were activated at controlled examinations, and measurements of the width of post-extraction spaces were performed by photogrammetry and digital caliper. Results. The results showed that average reduction of post-extraction space width was 1.00 mm per month by photogrammetric measurement, while the average values of measurements with a digital caliper were 1.02 mm. The average values were measured in six time intervals and a statistically significant change in average intervals of post-extraction spaces during 6 months was determined. Conclusion. The elastic chain has proven to be a very effective mechanism for closing post-extraction space, and photogrammetry as a simple and precise method for monitoring results of treatment. Since the difference in relation to measurements with a digital caliper is minimal, photogrammetry can be routinely applied in everyday practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提取后空间闭合的摄影测量分析
介绍。当计划正畸治疗时,有时需要个别牙齿的拔牙,以达到适当的咬合和可接受的美观外观。临床医生认为弹性链作为固定矫治器拔牙后间隙闭合的方法具有最大的优势。在关闭拔牙后间隙时,有必要进行测量,以便调整治疗方案。摄影测量是最受欢迎的方法之一。本研究的目的是通过摄影测量的方法,分析在固定矫治器正畸治疗中,弹性链封闭拔牙后空隙的效果。材料和方法。本研究共收集了19例患者的38个拔牙后牙位,并采用固定矫治器进行第一前磨牙的拔牙,以达到治疗目的。使用弹性链条封闭拔牙后空间。拔牙后部位监测6个月,每4周随访一次。在控制检查中激活机制,并通过摄影测量和数字卡尺测量提取后空间的宽度。结果。结果表明:采用摄影测量法,提取后空间宽度每月平均减少1.00 mm,而采用数字卡尺测量法,提取后空间宽度每月平均减少1.02 mm。在六个时间间隔内测量平均值,并确定6个月内拔牙后空间的平均间隔有统计学意义的变化。结论。弹性链已被证明是一种非常有效的封闭拔牙后空间的机制,摄影测量是一种简单而精确的监测治疗结果的方法。由于与数字卡尺测量的差异很小,摄影测量可以在日常实践中常规应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral health effects on the nutritional status of elderly people Oral-health awareness among pregnant women in the region of Republika Srpska The assessment of primary teeth condition in 6 year-old children in Podgorica municipality Quality indicators of dental health care in Serbia The main characteristics and application of the shape memory alloys in orthodontics and endodontics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1