Efficient Satisfaction Building: A Comparative Study of Ski Resorts

Bozana Zekan, J. Mazanec
{"title":"Efficient Satisfaction Building: A Comparative Study of Ski Resorts","authors":"Bozana Zekan, J. Mazanec","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3674798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Destination managers aim at assuring high visitor satisfaction. Efficiency in satisfaction building has been a neglected issue in tourism research. In this study the authors examine the levels of efficiency which ski resorts attain in pursuing this objective. Configurations of satisfaction dimensions lead to some level of overall satisfaction. If high ratings for all dimensions are not necessary for achieving top overall satisfaction, destination managers get room for efficiency improvement. In a mixed-methods approach the authors analyze data from a sample of 54 Austrian, French, German, Italian, and Swiss ski resorts based on a survey totaling 12,234 cases. The two methods, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), complement each other. An individual satisfaction item contributes to overall satisfaction depending on the simultaneous value of other items. QCA shows the holistic effect of such item configurations. DEA extracts the differences with regard to efficient satisfaction building and paves the way for resort benchmarking by proposing best-fitting benchmarking partners. Results indicate that destinations need not deliver top service quality in all satisfaction dimensions to achieve above average overall satisfaction. 33 out of 54 resorts turn out to be inefficient in their satisfaction building efforts.\n","PeriodicalId":236490,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Economics: Firm Behavior & Microeconomic Issues eJournal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Economics: Firm Behavior & Microeconomic Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Destination managers aim at assuring high visitor satisfaction. Efficiency in satisfaction building has been a neglected issue in tourism research. In this study the authors examine the levels of efficiency which ski resorts attain in pursuing this objective. Configurations of satisfaction dimensions lead to some level of overall satisfaction. If high ratings for all dimensions are not necessary for achieving top overall satisfaction, destination managers get room for efficiency improvement. In a mixed-methods approach the authors analyze data from a sample of 54 Austrian, French, German, Italian, and Swiss ski resorts based on a survey totaling 12,234 cases. The two methods, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), complement each other. An individual satisfaction item contributes to overall satisfaction depending on the simultaneous value of other items. QCA shows the holistic effect of such item configurations. DEA extracts the differences with regard to efficient satisfaction building and paves the way for resort benchmarking by proposing best-fitting benchmarking partners. Results indicate that destinations need not deliver top service quality in all satisfaction dimensions to achieve above average overall satisfaction. 33 out of 54 resorts turn out to be inefficient in their satisfaction building efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效满意度构建:滑雪场的比较研究
目的地管理者的目标是确保游客的高满意度。满意度建立的效率一直是旅游研究中被忽视的问题。在这项研究中,作者考察了滑雪场在追求这一目标时所达到的效率水平。满意度维度的配置导致某种程度的总体满意度。如果所有维度的高评级不是达到最高整体满意度所必需的,目的地管理者就有了提高效率的空间。作者采用混合方法分析了来自54个奥地利、法国、德国、意大利和瑞士滑雪胜地的样本数据,这些样本基于一项总计12234例的调查。定性比较分析(QCA)和数据包络分析(DEA)这两种方法是相辅相成的。个体满意度项目对整体满意度的贡献取决于其他项目的同时价值。QCA显示了这些项目配置的整体效果。DEA提取了有效满意度建设方面的差异,并通过提出最合适的基准合作伙伴为度假村基准制定铺平了道路。结果表明,目的地不需要在所有满意度维度上提供最高的服务质量,就能达到高于平均水平的整体满意度。54个度假村中有33个在满意度建设方面效率低下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simplifying Business Group Structures: Value and Governance Implications for Korean Chaebols Regulatory Provisions under Companies Act 2013 Related to Independent Director from Corporate Governance Perscpective Qualitative Insights into Corporate Governance Reform, Management Decision-Making, and Accounting Performance Semi-structured Interview Evidence Should Shareholders Have a Say on Acquisitions? Growth and Performance of MSMEs in Poonch District: Prospective and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1