Privacy, Law, Code and Social Networking Sites

L. Edwards
{"title":"Privacy, Law, Code and Social Networking Sites","authors":"L. Edwards","doi":"10.4337/9781849805025.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problems created by the rise of social networks for user privacy have become well known throughout the world since the early paper co-authored by Edwards with Ian Brown of Oxford on data self regulation (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148732). Reconciling the desire to self-disclose information with the simultaneous desire that this information be protected remains a difficult task, exacerbated by the increasing service provider monetisation of users data via profiling and targeted marketing both when interacting on and off the network itself. Building on the earlier work, this chapter analyses how law, code and norms all currently offer some but insufficient solutions to the problems of online social network privacy when faced with the market drive to make profits. The issues for children and young people are given particular attention, drawing on the work of inter alia boyd, palfrey and Livingstone. Although the law may provide some protections through traditional European DP law remedies, current law suffers from the general illusory nature of consent in the online consumer standard term contract environment. Regulation of SNS terms of service using ideas drawn from EU unfair contracts law may offer some help, bu tbest privacy protection is likely to arise from serious regulation of code in the shape of the defaults for disclosure on the sites themselves. The paper also proposes a user-friendly start up routine where users will shape their privacy preferences in a meaningful fashion and surveys some future solutions posited in the draft EC Data Protection Regulation.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805025.00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The problems created by the rise of social networks for user privacy have become well known throughout the world since the early paper co-authored by Edwards with Ian Brown of Oxford on data self regulation (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148732). Reconciling the desire to self-disclose information with the simultaneous desire that this information be protected remains a difficult task, exacerbated by the increasing service provider monetisation of users data via profiling and targeted marketing both when interacting on and off the network itself. Building on the earlier work, this chapter analyses how law, code and norms all currently offer some but insufficient solutions to the problems of online social network privacy when faced with the market drive to make profits. The issues for children and young people are given particular attention, drawing on the work of inter alia boyd, palfrey and Livingstone. Although the law may provide some protections through traditional European DP law remedies, current law suffers from the general illusory nature of consent in the online consumer standard term contract environment. Regulation of SNS terms of service using ideas drawn from EU unfair contracts law may offer some help, bu tbest privacy protection is likely to arise from serious regulation of code in the shape of the defaults for disclosure on the sites themselves. The paper also proposes a user-friendly start up routine where users will shape their privacy preferences in a meaningful fashion and surveys some future solutions posited in the draft EC Data Protection Regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私,法律,代码和社交网站
自爱德华兹与牛津大学的伊恩•布朗(Ian Brown)就数据自我监管发表早期论文以来,社交网络兴起所带来的用户隐私问题已为全世界所熟知(http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148732)。协调自我披露信息的愿望与同时保护这些信息的愿望仍然是一项艰巨的任务,而越来越多的服务提供商通过分析和有针对性的营销在网络上和网络外进行交互时将用户数据货币化,这加剧了这一任务。在之前工作的基础上,本章分析了当前法律、法规和规范如何在面对市场盈利驱动时为在线社交网络隐私问题提供了一些但不足的解决方案。儿童和年轻人的问题受到特别关注,借鉴了博伊德、帕尔弗里和利文斯通等人的工作。尽管法律可以通过传统的欧洲DP法律补救措施提供一些保护,但现行法律在在线消费者标准期限合同环境中普遍存在“同意”的虚幻性。借鉴欧盟《不公平合同法》的理念来监管社交网站的服务条款可能会有所帮助,但最好的隐私保护可能来自于对网站本身默认披露形式的代码的严格监管。该文件还提出了一个用户友好的启动程序,用户将以有意义的方式塑造他们的隐私偏好,并调查了欧盟数据保护条例草案中提出的一些未来解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1