A Team Production Proposal to the Shareholder - Stakeholder Quarrel: The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance

A. Kaufman, Ernie Englander
{"title":"A Team Production Proposal to the Shareholder - Stakeholder Quarrel: The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance","authors":"A. Kaufman, Ernie Englander","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1030846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among international agencies striving to establish global corporate governance norms, the Anglo-American Shareholder Value Model has become paradigmatic. Ironically, its ascendancy occurred as its principle academic progenitors, financial agency theorists, conceded the shareholder maxim misleading. Now, Financial Agency theorists speak of enlightened stakeholder theory and instruct directors to maximize the firm's long-term value. This theory's persistence owes much to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)'s Principles of Corporate Governance. The Principles uneasily incorporates the two contending corporate models, shareholder value maximization and stakeholder theory. Unfortunately, this shareholder - stakeholder counterpoint has lost its relevance. Accordingly good governance principles must rest on a microeconomic theory in which the firm operates as a voluntary association that, by safeguarding firm specific investments, encourages capital (especially, human capital) investments. The team production theory of the firm, found in behavioral law and economics, provides such a model.","PeriodicalId":139028,"journal":{"name":"BHNP: History of Management Theory & Practice (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BHNP: History of Management Theory & Practice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1030846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Among international agencies striving to establish global corporate governance norms, the Anglo-American Shareholder Value Model has become paradigmatic. Ironically, its ascendancy occurred as its principle academic progenitors, financial agency theorists, conceded the shareholder maxim misleading. Now, Financial Agency theorists speak of enlightened stakeholder theory and instruct directors to maximize the firm's long-term value. This theory's persistence owes much to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)'s Principles of Corporate Governance. The Principles uneasily incorporates the two contending corporate models, shareholder value maximization and stakeholder theory. Unfortunately, this shareholder - stakeholder counterpoint has lost its relevance. Accordingly good governance principles must rest on a microeconomic theory in which the firm operates as a voluntary association that, by safeguarding firm specific investments, encourages capital (especially, human capital) investments. The team production theory of the firm, found in behavioral law and economics, provides such a model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对股东与利益相关者之争的团队生产建议:经合组织公司治理原则
在努力建立全球公司治理规范的国际机构中,英美股东价值模式已成为典范。具有讽刺意味的是,当它的主要学术鼻祖——金融代理理论家承认股东准则具有误导性时,它就占据了上风。现在,金融机构理论家提出了开明的利益相关者理论,并指导董事们最大化公司的长期价值。这一理论的持续存在在很大程度上要归功于经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的公司治理原则。《原则》令人不安地融合了两种相互竞争的公司模型,股东价值最大化理论和利益相关者理论。不幸的是,这种股东与利益相关者的对位已经失去了相关性。因此,良好的治理原则必须建立在微观经济理论的基础上,在微观经济理论中,企业作为一个自愿协会运作,通过保护企业的特定投资,鼓励资本(尤其是人力资本)投资。行为法学和经济学中的企业团队生产理论提供了这样一个模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peter Drucker on Social Ecology, Balancing Change and Continuity, and Building a Functioning Society Finance And Mathematics: Merger Or Acquisitions? Behavioral Aspects and Decision-Making Research in Accounting: History, Recent Developments, and Some Future Directions Organizational Change Models: A Comparison Analysis of Extremes in Management Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1