Evaluation of Sustainable P4MCL/PLLA Block Copolymers as PVC Replacement in Medical Plastics

Tyler J Gathman, J. Schoephoerster, R. Vasdev, Stephanie Liffland, Derek C. Batiste
{"title":"Evaluation of Sustainable P4MCL/PLLA Block Copolymers as PVC Replacement in Medical Plastics","authors":"Tyler J Gathman, J. Schoephoerster, R. Vasdev, Stephanie Liffland, Derek C. Batiste","doi":"10.1115/dmd2022-1051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aliphatic polyesters are potential sustainable alternatives to PVC for use in medical devices, such as IV bags. Our candidate replacement of PVC-based IV bags use P4MCL, a sustainable polymer with demonstrated uses in mechanically robust materials. The goal of our project was to compare the mechanical and biocompatibility characteristics of P4MCL/PLLA star block copolymer TPEs with commercial PVC-based IV bags. P4MCL/PLLA TPEs were synthesized according to previously reported methods. Uniaxial tensile testing was conducted pre- and post-autoclave. Impact and tear resistance testing was performed on non-autoclaved specimens according to ASTM standards. Cytotoxicity was examined using NIH 3T3 Fibroblasts with an AlamarBlue assay. A student’s t-test was used to compare results with statistical significance of P < 0.05. PVC tended to be stiffer but P4MCL/PLLA was more extensible. The tensile properties for the P4MCL-based material did not change after autoclaving. When compared to PVC-based IV bags, the P4MCL/PLLA TPE demonstrated a lower peak force and average force but a greater elongation at break and total absorbed energy (P<0.05). P4MCL/PLLA, unlike PVC-based materials with DEHP plasticizer, was non-cytotoxic. In summary, P4MCL/PLLA has desirable mechanical and biocompatibility advantages compared to PVC making the material a potential sustainable alternative for medical grade plastics.","PeriodicalId":236105,"journal":{"name":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2022-1051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aliphatic polyesters are potential sustainable alternatives to PVC for use in medical devices, such as IV bags. Our candidate replacement of PVC-based IV bags use P4MCL, a sustainable polymer with demonstrated uses in mechanically robust materials. The goal of our project was to compare the mechanical and biocompatibility characteristics of P4MCL/PLLA star block copolymer TPEs with commercial PVC-based IV bags. P4MCL/PLLA TPEs were synthesized according to previously reported methods. Uniaxial tensile testing was conducted pre- and post-autoclave. Impact and tear resistance testing was performed on non-autoclaved specimens according to ASTM standards. Cytotoxicity was examined using NIH 3T3 Fibroblasts with an AlamarBlue assay. A student’s t-test was used to compare results with statistical significance of P < 0.05. PVC tended to be stiffer but P4MCL/PLLA was more extensible. The tensile properties for the P4MCL-based material did not change after autoclaving. When compared to PVC-based IV bags, the P4MCL/PLLA TPE demonstrated a lower peak force and average force but a greater elongation at break and total absorbed energy (P<0.05). P4MCL/PLLA, unlike PVC-based materials with DEHP plasticizer, was non-cytotoxic. In summary, P4MCL/PLLA has desirable mechanical and biocompatibility advantages compared to PVC making the material a potential sustainable alternative for medical grade plastics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P4MCL/PLLA嵌段共聚物在医用塑料中替代PVC的研究
脂肪族聚酯是PVC的潜在可持续替代品,可用于医疗设备,如静脉输液袋。我们的候选pvc基IV袋替代品使用P4MCL,一种可持续聚合物,在机械坚固的材料中得到了证明。我们项目的目标是比较P4MCL/PLLA星形嵌段共聚物TPEs与商用pvc基IV袋的机械和生物相容性特性。P4MCL/PLLA TPEs根据先前报道的方法合成。在高压灭菌前后分别进行了单轴拉伸试验。根据ASTM标准对非蒸压试样进行抗冲击和抗撕裂试验。使用NIH 3T3成纤维细胞用AlamarBlue检测细胞毒性。比较结果采用学生t检验,P < 0.05有统计学意义。PVC趋于刚性,而P4MCL/PLLA具有更强的可扩展性。高压灭菌后,p4mcl基材料的拉伸性能没有变化。与pvc基IV袋相比,P4MCL/PLLA TPE表现出更低的峰值力和平均力,但断裂伸长率和总吸收能量更高(P<0.05)。与使用DEHP增塑剂的pvc基材料不同,P4MCL/PLLA没有细胞毒性。总之,与PVC相比,P4MCL/PLLA具有理想的机械和生物相容性优势,使该材料成为医疗级塑料的潜在可持续替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communicating Cybersecurity and Privacy Design Attributes through Privacy Labeling of Consumer Electronic Medical Devices A Novel Tool for Auricle Retraction During Closure of Post-Auricular Incisions Development and Characterization of Biostable Hydrogel Robotic Actuators for Implantable Devices: Tendon Actuated Gelatin Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis to Expedite Treatment and Prevent Pulmonary Embolism During Gestation Development of an Epicardial Mapping Tank for Noninvasive Electrical Mapping of Ex Vivo Large Mammalian Hearts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1