Ergodicity-Breaking Reveals Time Optimal Economic Behavior in Humans

David Meder, Finn Rabe, Tobias Morville, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen, Magnus T. Koudahl, R. Dolan, H. Siebner, O. Hulme
{"title":"Ergodicity-Breaking Reveals Time Optimal Economic Behavior in Humans","authors":"David Meder, Finn Rabe, Tobias Morville, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen, Magnus T. Koudahl, R. Dolan, H. Siebner, O. Hulme","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1089-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ergodicity describes an equivalence between the expectation value and the time average of observables. Applied to human behaviour, ergodic theory reveals how individuals should tolerate risk in different environments. To optimise wealth over time, agents should adapt their utility function according to the dynamical setting they face. Linear utility is optimal for additive dynamics, whereas logarithmic utility is optimal for multiplicative dynamics. Whether humans approximate time optimal behavior across different dynamics is unknown. Here we compare the effects of additive versus multiplicative gamble dynamics on risky choice. We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing economic theory. Instead, as predicted by time optimality, risk aversion increases under multiplicative dynamics, distributing close to the values that maximise the time average growth of wealth. We suggest that our findings motivate a need for explicitly grounding theories of decision-making on ergodic considerations.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1089-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Ergodicity describes an equivalence between the expectation value and the time average of observables. Applied to human behaviour, ergodic theory reveals how individuals should tolerate risk in different environments. To optimise wealth over time, agents should adapt their utility function according to the dynamical setting they face. Linear utility is optimal for additive dynamics, whereas logarithmic utility is optimal for multiplicative dynamics. Whether humans approximate time optimal behavior across different dynamics is unknown. Here we compare the effects of additive versus multiplicative gamble dynamics on risky choice. We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing economic theory. Instead, as predicted by time optimality, risk aversion increases under multiplicative dynamics, distributing close to the values that maximise the time average growth of wealth. We suggest that our findings motivate a need for explicitly grounding theories of decision-making on ergodic considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遍历性破坏揭示了人类时间最优经济行为
遍历性描述了可观测值的期望值和时间平均值之间的等价性。将遍历理论应用于人类行为,揭示了个体在不同环境中应该如何承受风险。为了使财富随着时间的推移而优化,代理人应该根据他们所面临的动态环境来调整他们的效用函数。线性效用是最优的加法动力学,而对数效用是最优的乘法动力学。人类是否在不同的动力学中近似时间最优行为是未知的。在这里,我们比较了累加性和乘法赌博动力学对风险选择的影响。我们表明效用函数是由赌博动力学调节的,其方式无法被主流经济理论所解释。相反,正如时间最优性所预测的那样,风险厌恶在乘法动态下增加,分布在使财富时间平均增长最大化的值附近。我们认为,我们的研究结果激发了对基于遍历考虑的明确的决策理论的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives as Networks: Predicting Memory from the Structure of Naturalistic Events Subtractive gating improves generalization in working memory tasks Do LSTMs know about Principle C? Unfolding of multisensory inference in the brain and behavior Adversarial Training of Neural Encoding Models on Population Spike Trains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1