Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action

Jonathan A. Obar, Paul Zube, Cliff Lampe
{"title":"Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action","authors":"Jonathan A. Obar, Paul Zube, Cliff Lampe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1956352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Can social media promote civic engagement and collective action? Advocacy organizations think so. Obar, Zube, and Lampe surveyed 169 individuals from 53 advocacy groups of diverse interests and sizes and identified a revealing trend. All groups admitted that they use social media technologies to communicate with citizens almost every day. Respondents also believe that social media enable them to accomplish their advocacy and organizational goals across a range of specified activities. The authors note that the relationship between this and real political and ideological change is still speculative, but suggest that future studies can build on their research.","PeriodicalId":117077,"journal":{"name":"Political Methods: Computational eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"303","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Methods: Computational eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 303

Abstract

Can social media promote civic engagement and collective action? Advocacy organizations think so. Obar, Zube, and Lampe surveyed 169 individuals from 53 advocacy groups of diverse interests and sizes and identified a revealing trend. All groups admitted that they use social media technologies to communicate with citizens almost every day. Respondents also believe that social media enable them to accomplish their advocacy and organizational goals across a range of specified activities. The authors note that the relationship between this and real political and ideological change is still speculative, but suggest that future studies can build on their research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倡导2.0:美国倡导团体如何看待和使用社交媒体作为促进公民参与和集体行动的工具的分析
社交媒体能促进公民参与和集体行动吗?倡导组织是这么认为的。奥巴、祖布和兰普调查了来自53个不同兴趣和规模的倡导团体的169名个人,并发现了一个揭示性的趋势。所有组织都承认,他们几乎每天都使用社交媒体技术与公民交流。受访者还认为,社交媒体使他们能够在一系列特定活动中实现他们的宣传和组织目标。作者指出,这与真正的政治和意识形态变化之间的关系仍然是推测性的,但建议未来的研究可以建立在他们的研究基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Resource Allocation for Political Campaigns What's the Talk in Brussels? Leveraging Daily News Coverage to Measure Issue Attention in the European Union Fake News in Social Networks Text-as-Data Analysis of Preferential Trade Agreements: Mapping the PTA Landscape Selected Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1