Women With Self-Reported Stress Urinary Incontinence Had Differences in Clinical Measures Depending on Whether Jumping Jacks Provoked Leakage

Erin H. Hartigan, J. McAuley, Michael A. Lawrence, Megan Clarenbach, Jessica Sterling, Emily Quirion, C. Lewis
{"title":"Women With Self-Reported Stress Urinary Incontinence Had Differences in Clinical Measures Depending on Whether Jumping Jacks Provoked Leakage","authors":"Erin H. Hartigan, J. McAuley, Michael A. Lawrence, Megan Clarenbach, Jessica Sterling, Emily Quirion, C. Lewis","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) and hip impairments have been inconsistently reported in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) across studies. Subclassifying women with SUI based on a task that provokes leakage may identify more distinct groups. Objectives: To subclassify women with SUI who did and did not leak during jumping jacks (JJ) and to compare PFM and hip function among the SUI-leak and SUI-no leak groups and women without SUI (non-SUI). Study Design: A cross-sectional, exploratory study. Methods: Forty-one women completed 60 seconds of JJ and self-reported whether leakage occurred. Demographic data, PFM function, passive hip range of motion (ROM), and hip strength (manual muscle testing [MMT] and handheld dynamometry [HHD]) were compared among groups and limbs. Results: Nineteen women with SUI were subclassified based on self-reported leakage while JJ (SUI-leak, n = 9; SUI-no leak, n = 10) and 22 non-SUI. Age, parity, PFM power, vertical lift, hip internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength, and hip IR ROM differed among groups (P ≤ .040). SUI-leak group's PFM power did not differ between limbs (P = 1.00), whereas the other 2 groups' dominant limb (D-limb) was greater than nondominant limb (ND-limb) (P ≤ .002). SUI-leak group's hip ER HHD strength was greater in D-limb than in ND-limb (P = .02), whereas the SUI-no leak group's ER strength did not differ between limbs (P = .065). Conclusion: Both SUI groups were not able to lift during a PFM contraction; however, women with SUI who did not leak during JJ appear to use a unique interlimb strategy, and had less hip IR ROM, and stronger hip ER than those in the SUI-leak group.","PeriodicalId":114037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) and hip impairments have been inconsistently reported in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) across studies. Subclassifying women with SUI based on a task that provokes leakage may identify more distinct groups. Objectives: To subclassify women with SUI who did and did not leak during jumping jacks (JJ) and to compare PFM and hip function among the SUI-leak and SUI-no leak groups and women without SUI (non-SUI). Study Design: A cross-sectional, exploratory study. Methods: Forty-one women completed 60 seconds of JJ and self-reported whether leakage occurred. Demographic data, PFM function, passive hip range of motion (ROM), and hip strength (manual muscle testing [MMT] and handheld dynamometry [HHD]) were compared among groups and limbs. Results: Nineteen women with SUI were subclassified based on self-reported leakage while JJ (SUI-leak, n = 9; SUI-no leak, n = 10) and 22 non-SUI. Age, parity, PFM power, vertical lift, hip internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength, and hip IR ROM differed among groups (P ≤ .040). SUI-leak group's PFM power did not differ between limbs (P = 1.00), whereas the other 2 groups' dominant limb (D-limb) was greater than nondominant limb (ND-limb) (P ≤ .002). SUI-leak group's hip ER HHD strength was greater in D-limb than in ND-limb (P = .02), whereas the SUI-no leak group's ER strength did not differ between limbs (P = .065). Conclusion: Both SUI groups were not able to lift during a PFM contraction; however, women with SUI who did not leak during JJ appear to use a unique interlimb strategy, and had less hip IR ROM, and stronger hip ER than those in the SUI-leak group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我报告压力性尿失禁的妇女在临床测量上的差异取决于跳跳是否引起尿漏
背景:在不同的研究中,盆底肌肉(PFM)和髋关节损伤在女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)中的报道并不一致。根据引起渗漏的任务对SUI女性进行细分可能会识别出更多不同的群体。目的:对在开合跳(JJ)中发生和未发生渗漏的SUI女性进行亚分类,并比较SUI渗漏组、SUI无渗漏组和无SUI(非SUI)女性的PFM和髋关节功能。研究设计:横断面探索性研究。方法:41名妇女完成60秒的JJ并自我报告是否发生渗漏。统计数据、PFM功能、被动髋关节活动度(ROM)和髋关节力量(手动肌肉测试[MMT]和手持式测力[HHD])在组间和肢体间进行比较。结果:19例SUI患者以自报漏为分类依据,JJ (SUI-leak, n = 9;sui -无泄漏,n = 10)和22非sui。年龄、胎次、PFM功率、垂直举升、髋关节内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)强度、髋关节内旋ROM组间差异有统计学意义(P≤0.040)。SUI-leak组各肢间PFM功率差异无统计学意义(P = 1.00),而其他2组优势肢(d -肢)均大于非优势肢(nd -肢)(P≤0.002)。SUI-leak组的髋关节ER HHD强度D-limb大于ND-limb (P = .02),而SUI-no -leak组的ER强度在肢间无差异(P = .065)。结论:两个SUI组在PFM收缩时均不能抬起;然而,在JJ期间没有渗漏的SUI女性似乎使用了独特的肢间策略,与SUI渗漏组相比,髋关节IR ROM更少,髋关节ER更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Physical, Psychological, and Social Health Outcomes for Women in Bangladesh Effects of High-Intensity Resistance Versus Aerobic Training in PCOS Women at Risk for Psychological Trauma A Physical Therapist's Role in Providing a Trauma-Informed, Whole-Body, Holistic Approach to Address the Spiritual and Mental Health of Patients Prevalence, Knowledge, and Perceived Impact of Urinary Incontinence in Female Collegiate Athletes Managing Pelvic Floor Functional Roles of Stability and Respiration: Part of the Job for All Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1