Evaluating Flexibility of Business Models for Distributed Energy Resource Aggregators

M. Beus, I. Pavić, H. Pandžić, T. Capuder, I. Štritof, I. Androcec
{"title":"Evaluating Flexibility of Business Models for Distributed Energy Resource Aggregators","authors":"M. Beus, I. Pavić, H. Pandžić, T. Capuder, I. Štritof, I. Androcec","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2018.8469776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A transition from a traditional power system towards a low-carbon power system requires unlocking new sources of flexibility a t t he distribution level a nd engaging distribution system users to become electricity market participants. These users are usually too small to adequately position themselves in electricity markets. Therefore, the latest package of the European Commission highly encourages aggregating them into a single market entity. Aggregation of distribution system users can be realized through different business models. The main intention of this paper is to analyze two potential business models to be used for aggregation of distribution system users. The first one illustrates the case in which the supplier also offers aggregation services in markets or auctions on behalf of its customers. The second model considers the case in which a new market participant, called the “independent aggregator”, enables distribution system users to actively participate in electricity markets or offer services to the grid operator. The paper elaborates on the advantages of both models through simplified examples by positioning them within the current European market setup.","PeriodicalId":334674,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A transition from a traditional power system towards a low-carbon power system requires unlocking new sources of flexibility a t t he distribution level a nd engaging distribution system users to become electricity market participants. These users are usually too small to adequately position themselves in electricity markets. Therefore, the latest package of the European Commission highly encourages aggregating them into a single market entity. Aggregation of distribution system users can be realized through different business models. The main intention of this paper is to analyze two potential business models to be used for aggregation of distribution system users. The first one illustrates the case in which the supplier also offers aggregation services in markets or auctions on behalf of its customers. The second model considers the case in which a new market participant, called the “independent aggregator”, enables distribution system users to actively participate in electricity markets or offer services to the grid operator. The paper elaborates on the advantages of both models through simplified examples by positioning them within the current European market setup.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布式能源聚合器商业模型的灵活性评价
从传统电力系统向低碳电力系统过渡,需要在配电层面释放新的灵活性来源,并吸引配电系统用户成为电力市场的参与者。这些用户通常规模太小,无法在电力市场中充分定位。因此,欧洲委员会的最新一揽子计划高度鼓励将它们合并为一个单一的市场实体。通过不同的商业模式,可以实现配电系统用户的聚合。本文的主要目的是分析两种可能用于配电系统用户聚合的商业模式。第一个例子说明了供应商还代表其客户在市场或拍卖中提供聚合服务的情况。第二个模型考虑的情况是,一个新的市场参与者,称为“独立聚合者”,使配电系统用户积极参与电力市场或向电网运营商提供服务。本文通过简化的例子阐述了两种模式的优势,将它们定位在当前的欧洲市场设置中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast Frequency Control Services in Europe Development of the Polish Power Exchange as a Management System in Terms of Control Theory and Systems Engineering Are Consumption Tariffs Still Up-to-Date? an Operationalized Assessment of Grid Fees Enhancing N -1 Security via Building Thermostatic Load Control Strategy Improvement of DC Microgrid Voltage Regulation Based on Bidirectional Intelligent Charging Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1