‘I Don’t Want Anything Like That’: The Coercion of British Women and Girls into Domestic Service, 1918–1928

Elmarí Whyte
{"title":"‘I Don’t Want Anything Like That’: The Coercion of British Women and Girls into Domestic Service, 1918–1928","authors":"Elmarí Whyte","doi":"10.22459/lfhj.26.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the First World War (WWI) challenging women’s traditional sphere of work (the home) as well as Britain’s class structure, domestic service remained the largest employer of women and girls until the end of the Second World War. Why, given the reluctance of working-class women to return to domestic service after WWI, did so many take up ‘hated domestic service’ in the decade following the war?1 WWI increased working-class households’ reliance on women’s income—whether obtained through employment or unemployment benefits. While others have shown the role of state coercion in women’s employment in domestic service in the aftermath of WWI, this article highlights the extent to which working-class families were complicit in that coercion. As many British families were deprived of male breadwinners as a result of the war, some pushed their daughters to work as servants as it was one job ‘that any girl could get’.2Others turned to the occupation as a means of protecting the ‘moral health’ of a daughter, where they considered it to be in danger.3 Drawing upon a range of oral history testimonies, this article examines the role of working-class families in ensuring that domestic service remained an important feature of working-class women’s and girls’ lives throughout the 1920s.","PeriodicalId":376853,"journal":{"name":"Lilith: A Feminist History Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lilith: A Feminist History Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/lfhj.26.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the First World War (WWI) challenging women’s traditional sphere of work (the home) as well as Britain’s class structure, domestic service remained the largest employer of women and girls until the end of the Second World War. Why, given the reluctance of working-class women to return to domestic service after WWI, did so many take up ‘hated domestic service’ in the decade following the war?1 WWI increased working-class households’ reliance on women’s income—whether obtained through employment or unemployment benefits. While others have shown the role of state coercion in women’s employment in domestic service in the aftermath of WWI, this article highlights the extent to which working-class families were complicit in that coercion. As many British families were deprived of male breadwinners as a result of the war, some pushed their daughters to work as servants as it was one job ‘that any girl could get’.2Others turned to the occupation as a means of protecting the ‘moral health’ of a daughter, where they considered it to be in danger.3 Drawing upon a range of oral history testimonies, this article examines the role of working-class families in ensuring that domestic service remained an important feature of working-class women’s and girls’ lives throughout the 1920s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我不想要那样的东西”:强迫英国妇女和女孩做家务,1918-1928
尽管第一次世界大战挑战了女性传统的工作领域(家庭)和英国的阶级结构,但直到第二次世界大战结束,家庭服务仍然是妇女和女孩最大的雇主。既然第一次世界大战后工人阶级妇女不愿重返家务服务,那么为什么在战后的十年里有那么多人从事“令人讨厌的家务服务”呢?第一次世界大战增加了工薪阶层家庭对女性收入的依赖,无论是通过就业还是失业救济金获得的收入。虽然其他人已经展示了在第一次世界大战之后,国家强迫妇女从事家政服务的作用,但这篇文章强调了工人阶级家庭在这种强迫中的同谋程度。由于战争,许多英国家庭失去了养家糊口的男性,一些人强迫他们的女儿做仆人,因为这是一份“任何女孩都能做的工作”。另一些人则把这一职业作为保护女儿“道德健康”的一种手段,因为他们认为这一职业处于危险之中根据一系列口述历史的证词,本文考察了工人阶级家庭在确保家务服务在整个20世纪20年代仍然是工人阶级妇女和女孩生活的重要特征方面所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘Pleasure’, ‘Vice’ or ‘Profession’: Myriad Social Perceptions and Representations of Prostitutes in Colonial Calcutta “If you loved me, you’d sleep with me”: Constructions of Sexual Consent in 1970s Dolly Magazine Internationalising Lilith, localising diverse feminist pasts ‘Unspeakable atrocities’: The 1857 Hornet Bank massacre, interracial rape and white femininity on the Australian colonial frontier ‘Worthy’ Women: Power, Paternalism and Process of the National Shipwreck Relief Society of NSW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1