Manchar Lake’s Hypothetical Restoration and Willingness of Fishing Communities to Switch Back To Fishing

Muhammad Azeem, J. Memon, F. M. Mari
{"title":"Manchar Lake’s Hypothetical Restoration and Willingness of Fishing Communities to Switch Back To Fishing","authors":"Muhammad Azeem, J. Memon, F. M. Mari","doi":"10.22581/MUET1982.2101.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental and anthropogenic changes in lakes have implications for fishers’ livelihoods in form of their forced migration and occupational change. Those advocating lake restorations often face a dilemma whenasked if lake restoration will also restore the lost livelihoods. Answering such questions are difficult because most people are not programmed for frequent changes in their livelihood structures. Using the case study of Manchar Lake fishers who seemingly have faced such transition, this study brings insights on this broad question. We developed an in-person survey based on Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to study 300 fishers’ responses to a hypothetical situation whereby they were asked to “Switch Back” to Manchar Lake assuming that it has been restored to provide various ecosystem services. Results show that complete transformation in the livelihoods of fishing communities has taken place with remarkable variation in their access to assets and livelihood outcomes. Despite increase in their access to physical capital such as school, hospital, roads, and markets, the communities are still vulnerable to income shocks and rarely enjoy privileges such as house ownership. The comparative state of current and past livelihoods and asset possessions determine ones’ willingness to switch back to fishing in Manchar Lake. Those who may have performed better in the said transition are less likely to return to their erstwhile occupations even if the lake is restored and vice-versa. We conclude that satisfaction with current livelihood outcomes is low and willingness to switch back to fishing in Manchar Lake is high since many had been poor performers in the transition. While the environmental rationale for the Manchar Lake’s ecological restoration already exists, this study suggests that there also exists a socioeconomic rationale albeit in a way that restoration also supports contemporary ecological services such as tourism.","PeriodicalId":436878,"journal":{"name":"January 2021","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"January 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22581/MUET1982.2101.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Environmental and anthropogenic changes in lakes have implications for fishers’ livelihoods in form of their forced migration and occupational change. Those advocating lake restorations often face a dilemma whenasked if lake restoration will also restore the lost livelihoods. Answering such questions are difficult because most people are not programmed for frequent changes in their livelihood structures. Using the case study of Manchar Lake fishers who seemingly have faced such transition, this study brings insights on this broad question. We developed an in-person survey based on Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to study 300 fishers’ responses to a hypothetical situation whereby they were asked to “Switch Back” to Manchar Lake assuming that it has been restored to provide various ecosystem services. Results show that complete transformation in the livelihoods of fishing communities has taken place with remarkable variation in their access to assets and livelihood outcomes. Despite increase in their access to physical capital such as school, hospital, roads, and markets, the communities are still vulnerable to income shocks and rarely enjoy privileges such as house ownership. The comparative state of current and past livelihoods and asset possessions determine ones’ willingness to switch back to fishing in Manchar Lake. Those who may have performed better in the said transition are less likely to return to their erstwhile occupations even if the lake is restored and vice-versa. We conclude that satisfaction with current livelihood outcomes is low and willingness to switch back to fishing in Manchar Lake is high since many had been poor performers in the transition. While the environmental rationale for the Manchar Lake’s ecological restoration already exists, this study suggests that there also exists a socioeconomic rationale albeit in a way that restoration also supports contemporary ecological services such as tourism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曼查尔湖的假设恢复和渔业社区回归渔业的意愿
湖泊的环境和人为变化对渔民的生计产生影响,其形式是渔民被迫迁移和职业变化。当被问及湖泊恢复是否也能恢复失去的生计时,那些主张恢复湖泊的人往往面临两难境地。回答这些问题是困难的,因为大多数人的生活结构没有经常变化的习惯。通过对曼查尔湖渔民的案例研究,他们似乎面临着这种转变,这项研究为这个广泛的问题带来了见解。我们基于条件估值法(CVM)进行了一项面对面调查,研究了300名渔民对假设曼查尔湖已经恢复并提供各种生态系统服务的情况下被要求“回到”曼查尔湖的反应。结果表明,渔业社区的生计发生了彻底的转变,其获得资产和生计结果的差异很大。尽管他们获得学校、医院、道路和市场等有形资本的机会有所增加,但这些社区仍然容易受到收入冲击的影响,很少享有住房所有权等特权。当前和过去的生计和资产占有的比较状态决定了一个人是否愿意回到曼查尔湖捕鱼。那些在上述过渡中表现较好的人,即使湖泊恢复,也不太可能回到以前的职业,反之亦然。我们得出的结论是,对目前生计结果的满意度较低,而重返曼查尔湖捕鱼的意愿很高,因为许多人在转型过程中表现不佳。虽然曼查尔湖生态恢复的环境理由已经存在,但这项研究表明,恢复也存在社会经济理由,尽管在某种程度上,恢复也支持当代生态服务,如旅游业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-ground mineral/microfibrillated cellulose composite materials: Recycled fibers, engineered minerals, and new product forms Spraying starch on the Fourdrinier— An option between wet end starch and the size press The effect of microfibrillated cellulose on the wet-web strength of paper Application of foamed additives to the surface of wet handsheets Understanding wet tear strength at varying moisture content in handsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1