Comparison of Ascat Estimated Snow Thickness on First-Year Sea Ice in the Canadian Arctic with Modeled and Passive Microwave Data

J. Yackel, T. Geldsetzer, Mallik S. Mahmud, Rory Armstrong, V. Nandan, D. Barber, M. Fuller
{"title":"Comparison of Ascat Estimated Snow Thickness on First-Year Sea Ice in the Canadian Arctic with Modeled and Passive Microwave Data","authors":"J. Yackel, T. Geldsetzer, Mallik S. Mahmud, Rory Armstrong, V. Nandan, D. Barber, M. Fuller","doi":"10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The snow cover on sea ice is an important parameter controlling heat and momentum fluxes in our polar regions. Our understanding of snow thickness distributions on sea ice is severely limited by its vastness and numerous logistical difficulties. As such, we rarely collect enough in situ data from similar geographic locations to determine if and how the snow thickness distribution changes spatiotemporally. Geophysical changes in snow cover manifest as differences in dielectric properties, which are detectable in microwave emission and backscatter. Active microwave remote sensing offers improved spatial resolution when compared to passive microwave approaches. We apply our recently developed method that exploits the indirect thermodynamic control of the snow cover on near ice surface geophysical properties. The variance of C-band (5.3 GHz HH-polarization) microwave backscatter in winter (prior to melt) is assessed and is then used to estimate relative snow cover thickness and distribution. We assess the capability of our approach over landfast, first-year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and evaluate and compare our method against the Canadian Regional Ice Ocean Prediction system and AMSR2 passive microwave snow thickness estimates. Results demonstrate that this method can separate thick snow from thin snow on thick FYI within a thickness range of 5 to 45 cm at a spatial resolution of less than 5 km.","PeriodicalId":444267,"journal":{"name":"IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The snow cover on sea ice is an important parameter controlling heat and momentum fluxes in our polar regions. Our understanding of snow thickness distributions on sea ice is severely limited by its vastness and numerous logistical difficulties. As such, we rarely collect enough in situ data from similar geographic locations to determine if and how the snow thickness distribution changes spatiotemporally. Geophysical changes in snow cover manifest as differences in dielectric properties, which are detectable in microwave emission and backscatter. Active microwave remote sensing offers improved spatial resolution when compared to passive microwave approaches. We apply our recently developed method that exploits the indirect thermodynamic control of the snow cover on near ice surface geophysical properties. The variance of C-band (5.3 GHz HH-polarization) microwave backscatter in winter (prior to melt) is assessed and is then used to estimate relative snow cover thickness and distribution. We assess the capability of our approach over landfast, first-year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and evaluate and compare our method against the Canadian Regional Ice Ocean Prediction system and AMSR2 passive microwave snow thickness estimates. Results demonstrate that this method can separate thick snow from thin snow on thick FYI within a thickness range of 5 to 45 cm at a spatial resolution of less than 5 km.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大北极地区Ascat估算第一年海冰积雪厚度与模式和被动微波数据的比较
海冰上的积雪是控制我国极地地区热通量和动量通量的重要参数。我们对海冰上雪厚分布的理解受到海冰巨大和许多后勤困难的严重限制。因此,我们很少从相似的地理位置收集足够的现场数据来确定雪厚分布是否以及如何随时空变化。积雪的地球物理变化表现为介电特性的差异,这种差异可以通过微波发射和后向散射检测到。与被动微波方法相比,主动微波遥感提供了更高的空间分辨率。我们采用我们最近开发的方法,利用积雪对近冰表面地球物理性质的间接热力学控制。利用c波段(5.3 GHz hh偏振)微波后向散射在冬季(融化前)的方差,估算相对积雪厚度和分布。我们评估了我们的方法在加拿大北极群岛陆地上的能力,第一年的海冰,并与加拿大区域冰海洋预测系统和AMSR2被动微波雪厚估计进行了评估和比较。结果表明,该方法可以在小于5 km的空间分辨率下,在厚度为5 ~ 45 cm的厚FYI上实现厚雪与薄雪的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrieval of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Red Spectral Peak with Tropomi on Sentinel-5 Precursor Mapping the Rate of Carbon Mineralization in Oman Ophiolites Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Time Series Characterization of Biomass Burning Aerosols During the 2019 Fire Event: Singapore and Kuching Cities Exploitation of Earth Observations: OGC Contributions to GRSS Earth Science Informatics A Pseudospectral Time-Domain Simulator for Large-Scale Half-Space Electromagnetic Scattering and Radar Sounding Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1