The relationship between children's production and comprehension of realism in drawing

R. Jolley, Emma Knox, S. Foster
{"title":"The relationship between children's production and comprehension of realism in drawing","authors":"R. Jolley, Emma Knox, S. Foster","doi":"10.1348/026151000165850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two studies compared 2- to 14-year-olds’ production and comprehension of realism in human e gure drawings. In the comprehension task, children were asked to choose from an array of children’ s drawings the (1) most realistic drawing, (2) one they liked the best, and (3) one most similar to their own human e gure drawings. Both studies reported that children of all drawing levels typically selected a more advanced drawing than shown in their own productions for all three questions, except that the most advanced drawers consistently estimated their drawing level appropriately. In Study 2, children were also asked to place the drawings in an age-related developmental sequence. Performance on this task was positively related to the child’ s production level, independently of the child’ s age. It is concluded that production lags comprehension in drawing development, but that production level may have an ine uence on children’ s knowledge of the developmental sequence in drawing.","PeriodicalId":224518,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Development Psychology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Development Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Two studies compared 2- to 14-year-olds’ production and comprehension of realism in human e gure drawings. In the comprehension task, children were asked to choose from an array of children’ s drawings the (1) most realistic drawing, (2) one they liked the best, and (3) one most similar to their own human e gure drawings. Both studies reported that children of all drawing levels typically selected a more advanced drawing than shown in their own productions for all three questions, except that the most advanced drawers consistently estimated their drawing level appropriately. In Study 2, children were also asked to place the drawings in an age-related developmental sequence. Performance on this task was positively related to the child’ s production level, independently of the child’ s age. It is concluded that production lags comprehension in drawing development, but that production level may have an ine uence on children’ s knowledge of the developmental sequence in drawing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童绘画现实主义的产生与理解的关系
两项研究比较了2至14岁儿童对人物画现实主义的创作和理解。在理解任务中,孩子们被要求从一系列儿童画中选择(1)最逼真的画,(2)他们最喜欢的画,(3)最像他们自己画的人的画。两项研究都表明,在所有三个问题中,所有绘画水平的孩子通常都选择了比自己作品中显示的更高级的绘画,除了最先进的抽屉总是恰当地估计自己的绘画水平。在研究2中,孩子们也被要求按照与年龄相关的发展顺序排列图画。在这项任务中的表现与孩子的生产水平呈正相关,与孩子的年龄无关。结果表明,幼儿在绘画发展过程中,生产滞后于理解,但生产水平对幼儿对绘画发展顺序的认识有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task: Use of task goals Is there an alternative to simulation and theory in understanding the mind Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning in Children with and without Down's Syndrome. Parents, parenting, and children's sleep problems: Exploring reciprocal effects Can Children Construct Inverse Relations in Arithmetic? Evidence for Individual Differences in the Development of Conceptual Understanding and Computational Skill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1