Basic Approach to Identification of Critical Technologies: Estimation of the Most Important Engineering Attributes of a Product

А. Romanov, D. Shpotya
{"title":"Basic Approach to Identification of Critical Technologies: Estimation of the Most Important Engineering Attributes of a Product","authors":"А. Romanov, D. Shpotya","doi":"10.17238/issn2409-0239.2016.3.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This article justifies the importance of identification of critical technologies. Estimation of the most important engineering attributes using the project management approach, product lifecycles (PLC) and system engineering tools is considered to be the first important step before identification of critical technologies. Conventional system engineering instrument Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is emphasized as a basic tool. QFD consists of four phases (so called “Houses of quality”). The authors’ research showed that identification of critical technologies is possible during the second phase of QFD. The second phase must be initiated once the first phase is completed. The first phase possesses organizational and methodological disadvantages. Overcoming these disadvantages allowed the authors to propose an engineering technique named “Improved QFD” (IQFD). The authors describe the development process of the first PLC stage “concept development” of “Mayak” nanosatellite as a demonstration of IQFD functions: development of customer requirements, numeric fixing of correlations among engineering attributes in the House of Quality, utilization of determined weights of correlations during the final QFD ranking of each technical attribute. The IQFD ranking results are different from the QFD results. The analysis of the QFD and IQFD results and their comparison with an actual workflow of “Mayak” nanosatellite engineering verified and validated the correctness of the IQFD results and the inaccuracy of the QFD results.","PeriodicalId":436954,"journal":{"name":"Rocket-Space Device Engineering and Information Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocket-Space Device Engineering and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2409-0239.2016.3.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This article justifies the importance of identification of critical technologies. Estimation of the most important engineering attributes using the project management approach, product lifecycles (PLC) and system engineering tools is considered to be the first important step before identification of critical technologies. Conventional system engineering instrument Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is emphasized as a basic tool. QFD consists of four phases (so called “Houses of quality”). The authors’ research showed that identification of critical technologies is possible during the second phase of QFD. The second phase must be initiated once the first phase is completed. The first phase possesses organizational and methodological disadvantages. Overcoming these disadvantages allowed the authors to propose an engineering technique named “Improved QFD” (IQFD). The authors describe the development process of the first PLC stage “concept development” of “Mayak” nanosatellite as a demonstration of IQFD functions: development of customer requirements, numeric fixing of correlations among engineering attributes in the House of Quality, utilization of determined weights of correlations during the final QFD ranking of each technical attribute. The IQFD ranking results are different from the QFD results. The analysis of the QFD and IQFD results and their comparison with an actual workflow of “Mayak” nanosatellite engineering verified and validated the correctness of the IQFD results and the inaccuracy of the QFD results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关键技术识别的基本方法:产品最重要工程属性的估计
. 本文证明了识别关键技术的重要性。使用项目管理方法、产品生命周期(PLC)和系统工程工具评估最重要的工程属性被认为是识别关键技术之前的第一个重要步骤。传统的系统工程工具质量功能展开(QFD)被强调为一个基本工具。QFD包括四个阶段(所谓的“质量之家”)。作者的研究表明,在QFD的第二阶段确定关键技术是可能的。第二阶段必须在第一阶段完成后启动。第一阶段具有组织和方法上的缺点。为了克服这些缺点,作者提出了一种名为“改进的QFD”的工程技术。作者描述了“Mayak”纳米卫星的第一个PLC阶段“概念开发”的开发过程,作为IQFD功能的演示:客户需求的开发,质量之家工程属性之间相关性的数字固定,在每个技术属性的最终QFD排名中确定相关性权重的利用。IQFD排名结果与QFD结果不同。通过对QFD和IQFD结果的分析以及与“Mayak”纳米卫星工程实际工作流程的对比,验证了QFD结果的正确性和QFD结果的不准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sampling Theorem and Practical Usage of Entire Functions for Signal Representation Determination of the Relative Position of Objects by the First Phase Measuremen tDifferences of One Epoch The Research of Exciter Frequency Characteristics of a Quad-Band Antenna Based on a Corrugated Horn The Calculation Methodology for the Energetic Reserve of the Radio Link Space Craft–Station Calculation of Antenna Gain via 3D Radiation Pattern and Estimation of Their Mutual Influence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1