Exploring investors' willingness to use robo-advisors: mediating role of emotional response

Huosong Xia, Qian Zhang, J. Zhang, L. J. Zheng
{"title":"Exploring investors' willingness to use robo-advisors: mediating role of emotional response","authors":"Huosong Xia, Qian Zhang, J. Zhang, L. J. Zheng","doi":"10.1108/imds-07-2022-0400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate investors' willingness to use robo-advisors from customers' perspectives and analyzes the factors that drive them to use robo-advisors, including perceived usefulness and emotional response.Design/methodology/approachThe authors extend the Cognition-Affect-Conation (CAC) framework to the behavioral domain of robo-advisor users on financial technology platforms and conduct an empirical study based on 248 valid questionnaires.FindingsThe authors find two types of factors driving the willingness to use robo-advisors: perceived usefulness, trust and perceived risk as external driving forces and investor sentiment as an internal driving force. Trust has a significant positive effect on willingness to use, and arousal in emotional response plays a mediating role between perceived usefulness and willingness to use.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights for financial institutions to engage in robo-advisor innovation from customers' perspectives.","PeriodicalId":270213,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-07-2022-0400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to investigate investors' willingness to use robo-advisors from customers' perspectives and analyzes the factors that drive them to use robo-advisors, including perceived usefulness and emotional response.Design/methodology/approachThe authors extend the Cognition-Affect-Conation (CAC) framework to the behavioral domain of robo-advisor users on financial technology platforms and conduct an empirical study based on 248 valid questionnaires.FindingsThe authors find two types of factors driving the willingness to use robo-advisors: perceived usefulness, trust and perceived risk as external driving forces and investor sentiment as an internal driving force. Trust has a significant positive effect on willingness to use, and arousal in emotional response plays a mediating role between perceived usefulness and willingness to use.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights for financial institutions to engage in robo-advisor innovation from customers' perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨投资者使用机器人顾问的意愿:情绪反应的中介作用
本文旨在从客户的角度调查投资者使用机器人投资顾问的意愿,并分析驱动他们使用机器人投资顾问的因素,包括感知有用性和情绪反应。设计/方法/方法作者将认知-影响-意识(CAC)框架扩展到金融科技平台机器人顾问用户的行为领域,并基于248份有效问卷进行实证研究。研究结果作者发现,驱动使用机器人顾问意愿的两种因素:感知有用性、信任和感知风险是外部驱动力,投资者情绪是内部驱动力。信任对使用意愿有显著的正向影响,情绪反应唤醒在感知有用性与使用意愿之间起中介作用。独创性/价值本研究为金融机构从客户角度进行机器人顾问创新提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence drivers' effect on willingness to adopt the human capital supply chain in manufacturing firms: an empirical investigation from developing countries – a mediation model Linking transformational leadership and digital creativity from the lens of social cognitive theory Corrected Aggregate Workload approach on order release by considering job’s routing position induced variable indirect load Emerging opportunities for information systems researchers to expand their PLS-SEM analytical toolbox Sourcing from supplier in the presence of financial service providers’ information asymmetry and quit probabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1