Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutment in Different Angulation: An In Vitro Study

Rajib Banik, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Aeysha Siddika, Bithi Majumder, M. Abid, Mozammal Hossain
{"title":"Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutment in Different Angulation: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Rajib Banik, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Aeysha Siddika, Bithi Majumder, M. Abid, Mozammal Hossain","doi":"10.24018/ejdent.2023.4.3.252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe study was designed to find out the effect of different angulations of monolithic Zirconia custom-made abutments on fracture resistance. In this experimental type in vitro study, a total of thirty implant analogs with a diameter of 4.3 mm and a length of 11.5 mm were obtained for the maxillary central incisor. A total of thirty abutments specimens in three groups- 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree, ten in each group were fabricated with monolithic zirconium by CAD/CAM system. Each abutment was subjected to load until fracture in a Universal testing machine and data was collected to a data collection sheet. One-way ANOVA was done to compare the fracture load among the three groups and pairwise comparison was done by Tukey post hoc test. The statistical significance p-value was considered as less than 0.05. The range of fracture load of 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree angulated abutments were 590.55-1305.43N, 755.89-1720.55N, and 496.68-820.88N respectively. The highest fracture resistance was shown in 15-degree angulated custom-made zirconium abutments with a mean ± SD of 1223.442 ± 317.771N and the lowest fracture resistance was shown in case 25-degree with a mean ± SD deviation of 653.139 ± 102.045N. The mean ± SD of the 0-degree abutment was 948.944±245.588N. 95% Confidence interval of the mean were 773.260-1124.627N, 996.122-1450.761N, and 580.140-726.137N were assessed in cases of 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree respectively. The fracture load or fracture resistance among the three groups of custom-made monolithic zirconium abutments were significantly different. 15-degree angulated abutment had higher fracture resistance properties. straight abutment had more fracture resistance properties than that of 25-degree abutments, but less than 25-degree abutments.\n","PeriodicalId":197045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2023.4.3.252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was designed to find out the effect of different angulations of monolithic Zirconia custom-made abutments on fracture resistance. In this experimental type in vitro study, a total of thirty implant analogs with a diameter of 4.3 mm and a length of 11.5 mm were obtained for the maxillary central incisor. A total of thirty abutments specimens in three groups- 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree, ten in each group were fabricated with monolithic zirconium by CAD/CAM system. Each abutment was subjected to load until fracture in a Universal testing machine and data was collected to a data collection sheet. One-way ANOVA was done to compare the fracture load among the three groups and pairwise comparison was done by Tukey post hoc test. The statistical significance p-value was considered as less than 0.05. The range of fracture load of 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree angulated abutments were 590.55-1305.43N, 755.89-1720.55N, and 496.68-820.88N respectively. The highest fracture resistance was shown in 15-degree angulated custom-made zirconium abutments with a mean ± SD of 1223.442 ± 317.771N and the lowest fracture resistance was shown in case 25-degree with a mean ± SD deviation of 653.139 ± 102.045N. The mean ± SD of the 0-degree abutment was 948.944±245.588N. 95% Confidence interval of the mean were 773.260-1124.627N, 996.122-1450.761N, and 580.140-726.137N were assessed in cases of 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree respectively. The fracture load or fracture resistance among the three groups of custom-made monolithic zirconium abutments were significantly different. 15-degree angulated abutment had higher fracture resistance properties. straight abutment had more fracture resistance properties than that of 25-degree abutments, but less than 25-degree abutments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同角度对整体氧化锆定制基台抗断裂性能影响的体外研究
研究了不同角度的单片氧化锆定制基台对抗断裂性能的影响。本实验型体外研究共获得上颌中切牙种植体类似物30个,直径4.3 mm,长度11.5 mm。采用CAD/CAM系统制作0度、15度、25度三组共30个单片锆基牙试件,每组10个。每个基台在万能试验机上承受载荷直至断裂,数据被收集到数据收集表上。采用单因素方差分析比较三组患者的骨折负荷,两两比较采用Tukey事后检验。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。0度、15度、25度角基台断裂载荷范围分别为590.55 ~ 1305.43 n、755.89 ~ 1720.55 n、496.68 ~ 820.88 n。15度角定制锆基牙的抗折性最高,平均±SD偏差为1223.442±317.77 n; 25度角定制锆基牙的抗折性最低,平均±SD偏差为653.139±102.045N。0度基台的平均±SD为948.944±245.588N。0度、15度、25度的95%置信区间分别为773.260 ~ 1124.627 n、996.122 ~ 1450.761 n、580.140 ~ 726.137 n。三组定制整体锆基台的断裂载荷或断裂抗力存在显著差异。15度角基台具有较高的抗断裂性能。直线基台的抗断裂性能高于25度基台,但低于25度基台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Torch Ginger (Etlingera elatior) Towards Enterococcus faecalis: A Preliminary Research to the Alternative of Root Canal Irrigant of Primary Teeth Orthodontic and Surgical Management of Meir-Gorlin Syndrome: 7 Years of Follow-Up Intranasal Tooth in a Patient with Cleft Lip and Palate: Case Report Evaluation of Obturating Material Removal from Root Canal by Hedstrom and Rotary Retreatment File Management of Intracanal Separated Instrument Using Bypassing and Braiding Techniques: Case Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1