Experience of EU countries in legal regulation of agricultural land turnover between agricultural producers

M. Deineha, Ruslan Gutsol
{"title":"Experience of EU countries in legal regulation of agricultural land turnover between agricultural producers","authors":"M. Deineha, Ruslan Gutsol","doi":"10.31548/law2021.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the peculiarities of legal regulation of agricultural land turnover among agricultural producers in the EU countries and identifies the areas for improvement of national legislation in this area. The study finds that international experience indicates that there are various models of legal regulation of land turnover among agricultural enterprises which can be effective if they take into account the specific features of a particular country and national interests. Almost every country in the world regulates such turnover in one way or another. There are countries with “hard” and “soft” regulation of land transactions between agricultural producers. However, almost every developed EU country gives priority to farmers who live in the area and run their own farms, as opposed to large agricultural holdings. Despite the fact that in the EU countries the legislation on the turnover of agricultural land between agricultural producers is based on different models of legal regulation, the positive experience of these countries should be used to improve the national legislation in this area. In the area of legal support for the use of land by agricultural producers, the national land legislation should pay special attention to granting pre-emptive rights to purchase agricultural land to farms, territorial communities, tenants, etc; provide for the establishment of a preferential procedure for the acquisition of such land and the granting of tax benefits; and define the limits of land concentration at the level of regions and united territorial communities or establish a permit procedure for the acquisition of land plots with an area larger than that established in a particular region or united territorial community.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2021.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the peculiarities of legal regulation of agricultural land turnover among agricultural producers in the EU countries and identifies the areas for improvement of national legislation in this area. The study finds that international experience indicates that there are various models of legal regulation of land turnover among agricultural enterprises which can be effective if they take into account the specific features of a particular country and national interests. Almost every country in the world regulates such turnover in one way or another. There are countries with “hard” and “soft” regulation of land transactions between agricultural producers. However, almost every developed EU country gives priority to farmers who live in the area and run their own farms, as opposed to large agricultural holdings. Despite the fact that in the EU countries the legislation on the turnover of agricultural land between agricultural producers is based on different models of legal regulation, the positive experience of these countries should be used to improve the national legislation in this area. In the area of legal support for the use of land by agricultural producers, the national land legislation should pay special attention to granting pre-emptive rights to purchase agricultural land to farms, territorial communities, tenants, etc; provide for the establishment of a preferential procedure for the acquisition of such land and the granting of tax benefits; and define the limits of land concentration at the level of regions and united territorial communities or establish a permit procedure for the acquisition of land plots with an area larger than that established in a particular region or united territorial community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟国家对农业生产者之间农地流转的法律规制经验
本文考察了欧盟国家农业生产者农地流转法律规制的特殊性,并指出了在这方面国家立法需要改进的地方。研究发现,国际经验表明,对农业企业流转土地的法律规制模式多种多样,只要考虑到特定国家的具体特点和国家利益,就能发挥有效作用。世界上几乎每个国家都以这样或那样的方式管理这种流动。有些国家对农业生产者之间的土地交易实行“硬”和“软”监管。然而,几乎每个发达的欧盟国家都优先考虑居住在该地区并经营自己农场的农民,而不是大型农业控股。尽管欧盟国家对农业生产者之间农地流转的立法基于不同的法律规制模式,但应借鉴这些国家的积极经验来完善这一领域的国家立法。在对农业生产者使用土地的法律支持方面,国家土地立法应特别注意给予农场、领土社区、租户等优先购买农业用地的权利;规定为取得这类土地和给予税收优惠制定优惠程序;并在地区和联合领土共同体层面确定土地集中的限度,或建立比特定地区或联合领土共同体面积更大的土地征用许可程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative liability of juveniles for smoking Epistemological construction doctrine of the veterinary care defect phenomenon in forensic veterinary examination International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union) Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights The role of collective-contractual regulation in ensuring the right of agricultural workers to a safe and healthy working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1