{"title":"Partial Ambiguity Resolution for Low Cost GNSS Receiver in UAV Navigation Applications: A Comparative Study","authors":"Xin Liu, Jiaju Guo, Haoli Zhang, Dezhong Zhou, Yanqing Hou","doi":"10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9987056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares several Ambiguity Resolution (AR) methods, including the Least square AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment (LAMBDA) method, the Modified LAMBDA (MLAMBDA) method, the Two-step Success Rate Criterion (TSRC) method with the low cost GNSS receivers. The algorithms were firstly tested with the low cost ublox F9P dual frequency multi-GNSS receivers in vehicle field test and UAV flight test. The ambiguity fix rate and the Time To First Fix (TTFF) are used as indices to compare the algorithms. Experiments show that the Co-LAMBDA algorithm achieves a TTFF of 480 epochs and a fix rate of 53.7%, and the TSRC algorithm achieves a TTFF of 112 epochs and a fix rate of 91.3%. It can be seen that TSRC algorithm has better performance in both TTFF and fix rate in the low cost GNSS UAV dynamic positioning applications. Then the algorithms were tested with a quasi-dynamic medium-long baseline Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) experiment, a total of 970 experimental results verify that the TSRC algorithm improves the median fix rate from 41.51% to 90.83%, and the median correct rate slightly degrades from 100% to 96.98%, which is reasonable since it computes the statistics from many more fixed-solution samples.","PeriodicalId":345773,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9987056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper compares several Ambiguity Resolution (AR) methods, including the Least square AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment (LAMBDA) method, the Modified LAMBDA (MLAMBDA) method, the Two-step Success Rate Criterion (TSRC) method with the low cost GNSS receivers. The algorithms were firstly tested with the low cost ublox F9P dual frequency multi-GNSS receivers in vehicle field test and UAV flight test. The ambiguity fix rate and the Time To First Fix (TTFF) are used as indices to compare the algorithms. Experiments show that the Co-LAMBDA algorithm achieves a TTFF of 480 epochs and a fix rate of 53.7%, and the TSRC algorithm achieves a TTFF of 112 epochs and a fix rate of 91.3%. It can be seen that TSRC algorithm has better performance in both TTFF and fix rate in the low cost GNSS UAV dynamic positioning applications. Then the algorithms were tested with a quasi-dynamic medium-long baseline Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) experiment, a total of 970 experimental results verify that the TSRC algorithm improves the median fix rate from 41.51% to 90.83%, and the median correct rate slightly degrades from 100% to 96.98%, which is reasonable since it computes the statistics from many more fixed-solution samples.
本文将最小二乘歧义去相关平差法(LAMBDA)、改进LAMBDA法(MLAMBDA)、两步成功率准则法(TSRC)等几种歧义解决方法与低成本GNSS接收机进行了比较。首先在低成本ublox F9P双频多gnss接收机上进行了车辆现场试验和无人机飞行试验。以歧义修复率和首次修复时间(Time To First fix, TTFF)作为比较算法的指标。实验表明,Co-LAMBDA算法的TTFF为480个epoch,固定率为53.7%,TSRC算法的TTFF为112个epoch,固定率为91.3%。可以看出,在低成本GNSS无人机动态定位应用中,TSRC算法在TTFF和固定率方面都具有更好的性能。然后通过准动态中长期基线实时运动学(RTK)实验对算法进行了测试,共970个实验结果验证,TSRC算法将中位数固定率从41.51%提高到90.83%,中位数正确率从100%略微下降到96.98%,这是合理的,因为它计算了更多固定解样本的统计量。