A comparison framework for the evaluation of illumination compensation algorithms

Vassilios Vonikakis, R. Kouskouridas, A. Gasteratos
{"title":"A comparison framework for the evaluation of illumination compensation algorithms","authors":"Vassilios Vonikakis, R. Kouskouridas, A. Gasteratos","doi":"10.1109/IST.2013.6729703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new comparison framework, with the view to help researchers in selecting the most appropriate illumination compensation algorithm to serve as a preprocessing step in computer vision applications. The main objective of this framework is to reveal the positive and negative characteristics of the algorithms, rather than providing a single metric to rank their overall performance. The comparison tests, that comprise the proposed framework, aim to quantitatively evaluate the efficiency of algorithms in diminishing the effects of illumination in images. The proposed framework utilizes synthetic images, with artificial illumination degradations, which are enhanced by the tested algorithms. It represents a useful tool for the selection of illumination compensation algorithms as preprocessing in other applications, due to (a) its quantitative nature, (b) its easy implementation and (c) its useful estimations regarding many algorithm characteristics.","PeriodicalId":448698,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IST.2013.6729703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper presents a new comparison framework, with the view to help researchers in selecting the most appropriate illumination compensation algorithm to serve as a preprocessing step in computer vision applications. The main objective of this framework is to reveal the positive and negative characteristics of the algorithms, rather than providing a single metric to rank their overall performance. The comparison tests, that comprise the proposed framework, aim to quantitatively evaluate the efficiency of algorithms in diminishing the effects of illumination in images. The proposed framework utilizes synthetic images, with artificial illumination degradations, which are enhanced by the tested algorithms. It represents a useful tool for the selection of illumination compensation algorithms as preprocessing in other applications, due to (a) its quantitative nature, (b) its easy implementation and (c) its useful estimations regarding many algorithm characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评价照明补偿算法的比较框架
本文提出了一个新的比较框架,以帮助研究人员在计算机视觉应用中选择最合适的照明补偿算法作为预处理步骤。该框架的主要目标是揭示算法的积极和消极特征,而不是提供一个单一的指标来对它们的整体性能进行排名。包含所提议框架的比较测试旨在定量评估算法在减少图像中照明影响方面的效率。所提出的框架利用人工照明降低的合成图像,通过测试算法增强。它代表了在其他应用中选择照明补偿算法作为预处理的有用工具,因为(a)它的定量性质,(b)它易于实现,(c)它对许多算法特征的有用估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Odometry for autonomous robot navigation through efficient outlier rejection Three-dimensional temperature profiling of oxy-gas burner flames Urban construction area extraction using circular polarimetric correlation coefficient A practical pan-sharpening method with wavelet transform and sparse representation Void fraction measurement of gas-liquid two-phase flow in mini-pipe based on image sequence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1