Evaluation of the Thrombelastograph Targeted Coagulation Assessment

A. S. Bonness, A. Stammers, S. Huffman, S. J. Ficek, C. Brady
{"title":"Evaluation of the Thrombelastograph Targeted Coagulation Assessment","authors":"A. S. Bonness, A. Stammers, S. Huffman, S. J. Ficek, C. Brady","doi":"10.1051/ject/1996284191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extracorporeal circulation predisposes patients to hemorrhagic risk which may increase both homologous transfusion requirements and the need for pharmacological intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new diagnostic coagulation assay utilizing the thrombelastograph (TEG).\nFollowing Institutional Review Board approval, blood was drawn from healthy, non-medicated volunteers and four in vitro coagulopathic conditions were created, which included: hyperfibrinolysis (100% lysis), hypofibrinogenemia (<50 mg/dl), and both qualitative (1000 ug/ml nitroglycerin) and quantitative (<50 K/mm3) platelet abnormalities. Each of these four blood samples was then divided among four vials that contained known quantities of either: aminocaproic acid, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelet concentrate, or heparinase, and TEG profiles were completed.\nTwenty-one samples were evaluated and the following results were obtained. Hyperfibrinolysis- 100% correction of fibrinolytic potential in the aminocaproic acid vial, but none in the other vials. Qualitative platelet dysfunction- significantly improved time to coagulation in the platelet vial but not in the FFP, heparinase or aminocaproic acid vials. Quantitative platelet dysfunction- no significant difference observed between any vials. Hypofibrinogenemia- significant improvement in the TEG index in the FFP vial (-2.7 ± 0.5) when compared to the aminocaproic acid ( -8.6 ± 2.5, p<.001), platelet (-6.5 ± 0.5, p<.01) and heparinase (-8.8 ± 2.5, p<.001) vials.\nWe conclude that this coagulation assessment assay may help in identifying the specific source of bleeding during surgeries where hyperfibrinolysis, hypofibrinogenemia, or qualitative platelet dysfunctions are present.","PeriodicalId":309024,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1996284191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Extracorporeal circulation predisposes patients to hemorrhagic risk which may increase both homologous transfusion requirements and the need for pharmacological intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new diagnostic coagulation assay utilizing the thrombelastograph (TEG). Following Institutional Review Board approval, blood was drawn from healthy, non-medicated volunteers and four in vitro coagulopathic conditions were created, which included: hyperfibrinolysis (100% lysis), hypofibrinogenemia (<50 mg/dl), and both qualitative (1000 ug/ml nitroglycerin) and quantitative (<50 K/mm3) platelet abnormalities. Each of these four blood samples was then divided among four vials that contained known quantities of either: aminocaproic acid, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelet concentrate, or heparinase, and TEG profiles were completed. Twenty-one samples were evaluated and the following results were obtained. Hyperfibrinolysis- 100% correction of fibrinolytic potential in the aminocaproic acid vial, but none in the other vials. Qualitative platelet dysfunction- significantly improved time to coagulation in the platelet vial but not in the FFP, heparinase or aminocaproic acid vials. Quantitative platelet dysfunction- no significant difference observed between any vials. Hypofibrinogenemia- significant improvement in the TEG index in the FFP vial (-2.7 ± 0.5) when compared to the aminocaproic acid ( -8.6 ± 2.5, p<.001), platelet (-6.5 ± 0.5, p<.01) and heparinase (-8.8 ± 2.5, p<.001) vials. We conclude that this coagulation assessment assay may help in identifying the specific source of bleeding during surgeries where hyperfibrinolysis, hypofibrinogenemia, or qualitative platelet dysfunctions are present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血栓造影靶向凝血评估的评价
体外循环易使患者发生出血风险,这可能会增加同源输血的需求和药物干预的需要。本研究的目的是评估一种新的诊断凝血试验利用血栓描记仪(TEG)的功效。经机构审查委员会批准,从健康的非药物志愿者中抽取血液,并创建了四种体外凝血病理条件,包括:高纤维蛋白溶解(100%溶解),低纤维蛋白原血症(<50 mg/dl),定性(1000 ug/ml硝酸甘油)和定量(<50 K/mm3)血小板异常。然后将这四份血液样本分别放入四个小瓶中,这些小瓶中含有已知量的氨基酸己酸、新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)、浓缩血小板或肝素酶,并完成TEG谱。对21个样本进行评估,得到以下结果:高纤溶-在氨基己酸小瓶中100%校正纤溶电位,但在其他小瓶中没有。定性血小板功能障碍-血小板小瓶的凝血时间明显改善,但在FFP、肝素酶或氨基己酸小瓶中没有。定量血小板功能障碍-没有观察到任何小瓶之间的显著差异。低纤维蛋白原血症-与氨基己酸(- 8.6±2.5,p< 0.001)、血小板(-6.5±0.5,p< 0.01)和肝素酶(-8.8±2.5,p< 0.001)瓶相比,FFP瓶的TEG指数(-2.7±0.5)显著改善。我们的结论是,这种凝血评估试验可能有助于确定手术中存在高纤维蛋白溶解、低纤维蛋白原血症或定性血小板功能障碍的出血的特定来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Standardized Therapies after ECMO Program (STEP); A Novel Approach to Pediatric post-ECMO Care Traditional vs. modified Ringer lactate-based del Nido cardioplegia impacts on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results from a clinical trial Comparison of routine del Nido cardioplegia vs two types of modified del Nido cardioplegias for myocardial protection among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Adapting and Applying Student-centered Learning in a Perfusion Clinical Rotation Adapting and Applying Student-centered Learning in a Perfusion Clinical Rotation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1