“Rhopographic Photography and Atemporal Cinema: The Link Between Ralph Ellison’s Polaroids and Three Days Before the Shooting…”

Michael Germana
{"title":"“Rhopographic Photography and Atemporal Cinema: The Link Between Ralph Ellison’s Polaroids and Three Days Before the Shooting…”","authors":"Michael Germana","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Here in this country it's change the reel and change the man.\"-Senator Adam Sunraider in Three Days Before the Shooting...\"A paradox: the same century invented History and Photography.\"-Roland Barthes, Camera LucidaWhen Ralph Ellison passed away in 1994 at the age of eighty, he left behind a treasure trove of published writing that includes numerous short stories and book reviews, more than two volumes of essays of literary and cultural criticism, and his masterpiece Invisible Man, which won the National Book Award in 1953. He also left behind two archives-and two enigmas-that are the subjects of this essay. The first is the sprawling manuscript of an unfinished second novel upon which Ellison labored for forty years that was carefully pieced together by John F. Callahan and Adam Bradley and published in 2010 as Three Days Before the Shooting.... The other is a collection of hundreds of Polaroid photographs taken by Ellison over the last thirty years of his life, the subjects of which consist almost entirely of objects instead of people.When viewed in relation rather than in isolation, these two archives become less enigmatic. Instead, they appear as homologous components of Ellison's lifelong exploration of visual technologies of mechanical reproduction and the role these technologies play in reducing temporalities to form. That a tight connection exists between Ellison's photography and his fiction writing was first fully realized by Sara Blair, who convincingly demonstrates how the historical critique of Invisible Man is informed by, if not rehearsed in, Ellison's early street photography. In this essay, I extend Blair's argument by examining Ellison's later photography alongside his post-Invisible Man fiction. In the process, I illustrate how Ellison spent the last decades of his life using pen and camera together to trouble the temporal construct of static time that subtends progressive, linear histories-histories that underwrite the racial cartographies Ellison so lucidly critiqued in Invisible Man.To understand both the importance of Ellison's Polaroids and the ekphrastic logic of Three Days, Ellison's \"instant\" photographs need to be viewed as antidotes to the ways of seeing formalized by the sequential photographic apparatuses that organ-ize the identities of two of the novel's principal characters. In Three Days, Ellison juxtaposes the first-person narratives of two white subjects who internalize the form(s) of mechanical visual reproduction associated with his current and/or former profession. Book I of the novel is told from the point of view of a journalist and self-proclaimed liberal named Welborn McIntyre who unconsciously objectifies and thereby \"mortifies\" African Americans with a photographic gaze reflexively doubled by the still images that surround him. Book II, in turn, is partially told from the perspective of a U.S. Senator named Adam Sunraider whose atemporal filmic creations, traces of his younger days as a cinematographer, erupt into and overwrite his own disjointed personal history. These characters' modes of seeing and the technologies through which they are formalized represent two different, but equally problematic relationships to the past and, by extension, U.S. racial history.Crucially, each character's way of seeing is simulated ekphrastically in the respective books that constitute Ellison's novel. McIntyre views history as a linear progression, a view Ellison explicitly likens to a work of narrative cinema and, more pointedly, the sequential still images of which motion pictures are comprised. Because of McIntyre's unconscious racism and concomitant impulse to view black subjects as \"object[s] of historical knowledge\" (Gualtieri 155), his cinematic narrative is populated with still shots and freeze frames of African Americans. McIntyre's photographic gaze therefore photogrammatically reproduces the imaginary static material of which progressive history is made. …","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Here in this country it's change the reel and change the man."-Senator Adam Sunraider in Three Days Before the Shooting..."A paradox: the same century invented History and Photography."-Roland Barthes, Camera LucidaWhen Ralph Ellison passed away in 1994 at the age of eighty, he left behind a treasure trove of published writing that includes numerous short stories and book reviews, more than two volumes of essays of literary and cultural criticism, and his masterpiece Invisible Man, which won the National Book Award in 1953. He also left behind two archives-and two enigmas-that are the subjects of this essay. The first is the sprawling manuscript of an unfinished second novel upon which Ellison labored for forty years that was carefully pieced together by John F. Callahan and Adam Bradley and published in 2010 as Three Days Before the Shooting.... The other is a collection of hundreds of Polaroid photographs taken by Ellison over the last thirty years of his life, the subjects of which consist almost entirely of objects instead of people.When viewed in relation rather than in isolation, these two archives become less enigmatic. Instead, they appear as homologous components of Ellison's lifelong exploration of visual technologies of mechanical reproduction and the role these technologies play in reducing temporalities to form. That a tight connection exists between Ellison's photography and his fiction writing was first fully realized by Sara Blair, who convincingly demonstrates how the historical critique of Invisible Man is informed by, if not rehearsed in, Ellison's early street photography. In this essay, I extend Blair's argument by examining Ellison's later photography alongside his post-Invisible Man fiction. In the process, I illustrate how Ellison spent the last decades of his life using pen and camera together to trouble the temporal construct of static time that subtends progressive, linear histories-histories that underwrite the racial cartographies Ellison so lucidly critiqued in Invisible Man.To understand both the importance of Ellison's Polaroids and the ekphrastic logic of Three Days, Ellison's "instant" photographs need to be viewed as antidotes to the ways of seeing formalized by the sequential photographic apparatuses that organ-ize the identities of two of the novel's principal characters. In Three Days, Ellison juxtaposes the first-person narratives of two white subjects who internalize the form(s) of mechanical visual reproduction associated with his current and/or former profession. Book I of the novel is told from the point of view of a journalist and self-proclaimed liberal named Welborn McIntyre who unconsciously objectifies and thereby "mortifies" African Americans with a photographic gaze reflexively doubled by the still images that surround him. Book II, in turn, is partially told from the perspective of a U.S. Senator named Adam Sunraider whose atemporal filmic creations, traces of his younger days as a cinematographer, erupt into and overwrite his own disjointed personal history. These characters' modes of seeing and the technologies through which they are formalized represent two different, but equally problematic relationships to the past and, by extension, U.S. racial history.Crucially, each character's way of seeing is simulated ekphrastically in the respective books that constitute Ellison's novel. McIntyre views history as a linear progression, a view Ellison explicitly likens to a work of narrative cinema and, more pointedly, the sequential still images of which motion pictures are comprised. Because of McIntyre's unconscious racism and concomitant impulse to view black subjects as "object[s] of historical knowledge" (Gualtieri 155), his cinematic narrative is populated with still shots and freeze frames of African Americans. McIntyre's photographic gaze therefore photogrammatically reproduces the imaginary static material of which progressive history is made. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“地形摄影和时空电影:拉尔夫·埃里森的宝丽来和拍摄前三天之间的联系……”
“在这个国家,这是改变卷轴和改变人。”-参议员Adam Sunraider在枪击前三天…“一个悖论:同一个世纪发明了历史和摄影。”拉尔夫·埃里森于1994年去世,享年80岁,他留下了一个出版作品的宝库,其中包括许多短篇小说和书评,两卷多的文学和文化批评散文,以及他的代表作《看不见的人》,这部作品于1953年获得了国家图书奖。他还留下了两个档案和两个谜,这是本文的主题。第一个是埃里森未完成的第二部小说的庞大手稿,埃里森花了四十年的时间精心拼凑,由约翰·f·卡拉汉和亚当·布拉德利拼凑而成,并于2010年出版,名为《枪击前三天》....另一个是埃里森在他生命的最后三十年里拍摄的数百张宝丽来照片的集合,这些照片的主题几乎完全是物体而不是人。如果把这两份档案联系起来而不是单独来看,就会变得不那么神秘了。相反,它们似乎是埃里森毕生探索机械复制的视觉技术的同源组成部分,以及这些技术在将暂时性转化为形式方面所起的作用。埃里森的摄影和他的小说写作之间存在着紧密的联系,萨拉·布莱尔(Sara Blair)首先充分认识到这一点,她令人信服地论证了埃里森早期的街头摄影是如何为《看不见的人》的历史批判提供信息的,如果不是预先排练的话。在这篇文章中,我扩展了布莱尔的观点,考察了埃里森后期的摄影作品以及他的后隐形人小说。在这个过程中,我展示了埃里森在他生命的最后几十年里是如何用笔和相机一起来扰乱静态时间的时间结构的,这种时间结构掩盖了进步的、线性的历史——这些历史支持了埃里森在《看不见的人》中如此清晰地批评的种族地图。为了理解埃里森的宝丽来照片的重要性和《三天》的语言逻辑,埃里森的“即时”照片需要被视为一种解药,以解决由连续的摄影设备形成的形式化的观看方式,这些摄影设备组织了小说中两个主要人物的身份。在《三天》中,埃里森将两个白人的第一人称叙述并列在一起,这两个白人都内化了与他现在或以前的职业相关的机械视觉复制形式。小说的第一卷是从一个记者的角度讲的他自称是自由主义者,名叫威尔伯恩·麦金太尔他无意识地将非裔美国人物化,从而“羞辱”他的摄影凝视被他周围的静止图像反射性地加倍了。第二本书的部分内容则是从美国参议员亚当·桑德赖德(Adam Sunraider)的角度讲述的,他的非时空电影创作,他年轻时作为电影摄影师的痕迹,爆发并覆盖了他自己支离破碎的个人历史。这些角色的观察模式和将他们形式化的技术代表了两种不同的,但同样有问题的过去关系,以及延伸到美国种族历史。至关重要的是,每个角色的观察方式都在埃里森小说中各自的书中得到了生动的模拟。麦金太尔认为历史是线性发展的,埃里森明确地把这种观点比作叙事电影,更尖锐地说,是由电影组成的连续的静止图像。由于麦金太尔无意识的种族主义以及将黑人主体视为“历史知识的对象”的冲动(Gualtieri 155),他的电影叙事中充斥着非裔美国人的静止镜头和定格画面。因此,麦金太尔的摄影凝视从摄影语法上再现了创造进步历史的想象的静态材料。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter, Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, Issue 20, Spring 2020 Biopolitical Bollywood: Sexual Violence as Cathartic Spectacle in ​Section 375 and ​Article 15 Turning Inward: Using Insight as a Catalyst for Change in "The Corrections" Thematic Fields, Transgressive Religion Revisionist Spectacle? Theatrical Remediation in Alejandro G. Iñárritu's Birdman and Quentin Tarantino's The Hateful Eight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1