Concept Of Criminal Liability Of Notary Law In Deed Making Based On Perjury

Ailina Rahmanita Fauzi, S. Wahyuningsih
{"title":"Concept Of Criminal Liability Of Notary Law In Deed Making Based On Perjury","authors":"Ailina Rahmanita Fauzi, S. Wahyuningsih","doi":"10.30659/akta.v6i4.7581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose research These are 1) To analyze the concept of criminal responsibility notary law in the deed that is based on false information. 2) To analyze the legal consequences of the deed notary Based on False Information.The method used by researchers is Empirical Juridical (socio legal research)and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. Even the sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with an interview with a notary in Grobogan. And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. This study uses qualitative data analysis Based on the results of research that 1) Notaries can not be held criminal liability associated with the manufacture of the deed (partijnakten) based on false information, and can not meet the crime of counterfeiting element formulation in Article 266 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. 2) However, the notary can be held criminal liability against relaas deed or deed of officials (ambtelijke akten) if deliberate or careless notary make a fake deed to the detriment others. That made base on notary deed against false information does not in itself result in the deed null and void. The aggrieved party to the existence of the deed as it should file a civil suit to the court to cancel the deed.Keywords : Concept of Law; Criminal Responsibility; Notary; Deed; Specification False","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v6i4.7581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose research These are 1) To analyze the concept of criminal responsibility notary law in the deed that is based on false information. 2) To analyze the legal consequences of the deed notary Based on False Information.The method used by researchers is Empirical Juridical (socio legal research)and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. Even the sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with an interview with a notary in Grobogan. And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. This study uses qualitative data analysis Based on the results of research that 1) Notaries can not be held criminal liability associated with the manufacture of the deed (partijnakten) based on false information, and can not meet the crime of counterfeiting element formulation in Article 266 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. 2) However, the notary can be held criminal liability against relaas deed or deed of officials (ambtelijke akten) if deliberate or careless notary make a fake deed to the detriment others. That made base on notary deed against false information does not in itself result in the deed null and void. The aggrieved party to the existence of the deed as it should file a civil suit to the court to cancel the deed.Keywords : Concept of Law; Criminal Responsibility; Notary; Deed; Specification False
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于伪证立契的公证法刑事责任构想
研究目的是:1)分析基于虚假信息的契据中的公证法刑事责任概念。2)分析基于虚假信息的公证契约的法律后果。研究者使用的方法是实证法学(社会法律研究)和规范,在本研究中包括描述性分析。甚至本研究中数据的来源和类型都是从实地研究中获得的原始数据,并采访了Grobogan的公证人。以及从文献研究中获得的二手数据。本研究采用定性数据分析方法,根据研究结果认为:1)公证员基于虚假信息制造契据(partijnakten)不能被追究刑事责任,且不符合《刑法》第266条第(1)款与第55条第(1)款规定的伪造要件罪;公证员故意或者不小心伪造公证书,损害他人利益的,可以对公证书或者公证书追究刑事责任。以虚假信息为依据订立的公证契约本身并不构成公证契约的无效。受害一方对契约的存在,应向法院提起民事诉讼,要求撤销契约。关键词:法律概念;刑事责任;公证;行为;规范错误
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Re-Narrate the Relevance of Justice in Debtor Protection Related to the Parate Execution Carried Out by Separatist Creditors The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public The Implementation of Legal Position Regulation of Head of Services/Agency in Local Government The Implementation of a Complete Systematic Land Registration Program to Realize Legal Protection and Public Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1