Dynamic Capability Seen Through a Duality-Paradox Lens: A Case of Radical Innovation at Microsoft

B. Sugarman
{"title":"Dynamic Capability Seen Through a Duality-Paradox Lens: A Case of Radical Innovation at Microsoft","authors":"B. Sugarman","doi":"10.1108/S0897-301620140000022003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article brings a new, broad conceptual framework to the quest for understanding dynamic capability in organizations (i.e.\" managing on the edge of chaos\"). This approach rests on two major pillars: (i) a duality-paradox perspective and (ii) new typologies of organizational learning (OL) and individual action/thinking. A case of radical innovation at Microsoft provides a multi-level illustration; interpreting it requires a focus on two dualistic challenges. For use in future ODC research and practical assessment the broad new conceptual framework includes: (i) collaboration as a central concept; (ii) duality-paradox as a key source of conflicts that can threaten collaboration; (iii) five types of organizational learning, (iv) four types of individual action/thinking, including paradoxical thinking, and (v) the proposition that \"golden dualities\" can be created from once-troubling duality situations (where critical collaboration was in danger) which have been transformed from the (metaphorical) \"odd (contentious) couple\" into a \"productive (collaborative) partnership\".","PeriodicalId":212698,"journal":{"name":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620140000022003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article brings a new, broad conceptual framework to the quest for understanding dynamic capability in organizations (i.e." managing on the edge of chaos"). This approach rests on two major pillars: (i) a duality-paradox perspective and (ii) new typologies of organizational learning (OL) and individual action/thinking. A case of radical innovation at Microsoft provides a multi-level illustration; interpreting it requires a focus on two dualistic challenges. For use in future ODC research and practical assessment the broad new conceptual framework includes: (i) collaboration as a central concept; (ii) duality-paradox as a key source of conflicts that can threaten collaboration; (iii) five types of organizational learning, (iv) four types of individual action/thinking, including paradoxical thinking, and (v) the proposition that "golden dualities" can be created from once-troubling duality situations (where critical collaboration was in danger) which have been transformed from the (metaphorical) "odd (contentious) couple" into a "productive (collaborative) partnership".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从二元悖论的视角看动态能力:微软激进创新案例
本文为理解组织中的动态能力(即“在混乱的边缘进行管理”)提供了一个新的、广泛的概念框架。这种方法基于两个主要支柱:(i)二元悖论视角和(ii)组织学习(OL)和个人行动/思维的新类型。微软激进创新的一个案例提供了一个多层次的说明;解读它需要关注两个二元挑战。为了在未来的ODC研究和实际评估中使用,广泛的新概念框架包括:(i)作为中心概念的合作;(ii)二元悖论是威胁合作的冲突的主要来源;(iii)五种类型的组织学习,(iv)四种类型的个人行动/思维,包括悖论思维,以及(v)“黄金二元性”可以从曾经令人不安的二元性情况(关键合作处于危险之中)中创造出来的命题,这种二元性已经从(隐喻的)“古怪(有争议)的夫妻”变成了“富有成效(合作)的伙伴关系”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creativity and Corporate Culture Debiasing as a Powerful Management Accounting Tool? Evidence from German Firms The Analysis of Relationship Among Transformational Leadership Style and Performance of Personnel by Mediation Role of Organizational Culture Autonomy at Work in the Gig Economy: Analysing Work Status, Work Content and Working Conditions of Independent Professionals An Evidence-Based Model for Agile Organizational Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1