Screening and Placing Basic Skills Students.

Patricia E. Call
{"title":"Screening and Placing Basic Skills Students.","authors":"Patricia E. Call","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1982.10533782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basic Skills Programs (BSPs) are the fastest growing college and university programs in the nation. Yet there are many unsettled questions regarding the ad ministration and organization of these programs. One of these questions is how to select students for BSPs. Once students have been identified as lacking the minimum competence?in reading or writing or mathematics?necessary to function on the college level, should they be required to enroll in BSP instruc tion or should they volunteer? Four multi-campus systems of higher education came to grips with this issue by establishing systemwide guidelines. The Department of Higher Education, State of New Jersey (3); the University System of Georgia (2:2); and the City University of New York (4:26) adopted the policy that students showing deficiencies were required to enroll in Basic Skills Program courses. Entering freshmen at Pennsylvania State University who tested below the acceptable minimum scores on the system's BSP test had three terms (the normal freshman year) to raise their scores to acceptable levels. Deficien cies could be corrected by voluntary enrollment in BSPs, self-study, or by seeking tutoring (4:26). A search of the literature shows that multi-campus systemwide guidelines on the selection of students for BSPs such as those of New Jersey, Georgia, Pennsylvania State University, and the City University of New York were the exception, not the rule. A survey of the practices of BSPs in the twenty-four colleges and universities of West Virginia, conducted by this writer, revealed a diversity in student selection policies, not only between institutions but also within institutions. Four of the twenty-four institutions had centralized programs?one division or department responsible for all three basic skill areas. There were a total of fifty-eight separate BSPs.","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1982.10533782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Basic Skills Programs (BSPs) are the fastest growing college and university programs in the nation. Yet there are many unsettled questions regarding the ad ministration and organization of these programs. One of these questions is how to select students for BSPs. Once students have been identified as lacking the minimum competence?in reading or writing or mathematics?necessary to function on the college level, should they be required to enroll in BSP instruc tion or should they volunteer? Four multi-campus systems of higher education came to grips with this issue by establishing systemwide guidelines. The Department of Higher Education, State of New Jersey (3); the University System of Georgia (2:2); and the City University of New York (4:26) adopted the policy that students showing deficiencies were required to enroll in Basic Skills Program courses. Entering freshmen at Pennsylvania State University who tested below the acceptable minimum scores on the system's BSP test had three terms (the normal freshman year) to raise their scores to acceptable levels. Deficien cies could be corrected by voluntary enrollment in BSPs, self-study, or by seeking tutoring (4:26). A search of the literature shows that multi-campus systemwide guidelines on the selection of students for BSPs such as those of New Jersey, Georgia, Pennsylvania State University, and the City University of New York were the exception, not the rule. A survey of the practices of BSPs in the twenty-four colleges and universities of West Virginia, conducted by this writer, revealed a diversity in student selection policies, not only between institutions but also within institutions. Four of the twenty-four institutions had centralized programs?one division or department responsible for all three basic skill areas. There were a total of fifty-eight separate BSPs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛选和安置基本技能学生。
基本技能课程(BSPs)是美国发展最快的学院和大学课程。然而,在这些项目的管理和组织方面还有许多悬而未决的问题。其中一个问题是如何为bsp选择学生。一旦学生被认定为缺乏最低能力?在阅读、写作或数学方面?他们是否应该被要求参加BSP教学,还是应该自愿参加?四个多校区高等教育系统通过建立全系统的指导方针来解决这个问题。新泽西州高等教育部(3);佐治亚大学系统(2:2);纽约城市大学(4:26)采取了一项政策,要求有缺陷的学生参加基本技能课程。宾夕法尼亚州立大学的新生在系统的BSP测试中低于可接受的最低分数,他们有三个学期(正常的大一学年)来提高他们的分数到可接受的水平。缺陷可以通过自愿参加bsp、自学或寻求辅导来纠正(4:26)。对文献的搜索表明,多校区系统范围内的bsp学生选择指导方针,如新泽西、乔治亚、宾夕法尼亚州立大学和纽约城市大学的指导方针是例外,而不是规则。笔者对西弗吉尼亚州24所学院和大学的bsp实践进行了调查,结果显示,不仅在机构之间,而且在机构内部,学生选拔政策都存在多样性。24个机构中有4个有集中的项目?一个部门或部门负责所有三个基本技能领域。总共有58个独立的bsp。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accommodating the Remedial Student in the Content Class Teaching Political Theory: Meaning through Metaphor Responding to Students: Ughs, Awks, and Ahas Responding to Industry: Writing in a High Tech World. Promoting Professional and Personal Renewal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1