Statistical Interpretation of DNA Evidence in the Judicial Practice of Montenegro

J. Jovanović
{"title":"Statistical Interpretation of DNA Evidence in the Judicial Practice of Montenegro","authors":"J. Jovanović","doi":"10.51235/KT.2021.21.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementation of scientific methods in establishing facts relevants for criminalistics and legal proceedings can no longer be imagined without involving forensic examination of biological traces through analysis of DNA molecules. Legal norms for reaching a verdict bases on DNA evidance must be clearly set, and the interpretation and presentation of DNA evidence in court must be improved. Also, judges, prosecutors, lawyers must be constantly acquainted with and educated on the basics of forensics and the use of scientific evidence, in order to properly understand the DNA result and make correct judgments. Missing out some statistic-related facts and probability theory have led to certain legal omissions in both recent and past experience. \nOur goal with this article is to emphasize the importance of probability theories and statistics in forensic examination, particularly in interpretation of DNA results. Judges and lawyers accept the evidence based on their sense of reasoning. A necessary part is their greater participation and understanding of forensic reports and with the way of interpreting the evidence itself. It is responsibility of lawyers, judges and prosecutors is to understand the statistical evidence as much as possible. Standards of admissibility in court must be legally determined, and statistics and probability theory should be explained in detail to judges so they can make valid judgments.","PeriodicalId":375468,"journal":{"name":"Kriminalističke teme","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminalističke teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51235/KT.2021.21.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementation of scientific methods in establishing facts relevants for criminalistics and legal proceedings can no longer be imagined without involving forensic examination of biological traces through analysis of DNA molecules. Legal norms for reaching a verdict bases on DNA evidance must be clearly set, and the interpretation and presentation of DNA evidence in court must be improved. Also, judges, prosecutors, lawyers must be constantly acquainted with and educated on the basics of forensics and the use of scientific evidence, in order to properly understand the DNA result and make correct judgments. Missing out some statistic-related facts and probability theory have led to certain legal omissions in both recent and past experience. Our goal with this article is to emphasize the importance of probability theories and statistics in forensic examination, particularly in interpretation of DNA results. Judges and lawyers accept the evidence based on their sense of reasoning. A necessary part is their greater participation and understanding of forensic reports and with the way of interpreting the evidence itself. It is responsibility of lawyers, judges and prosecutors is to understand the statistical evidence as much as possible. Standards of admissibility in court must be legally determined, and statistics and probability theory should be explained in detail to judges so they can make valid judgments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑山司法实践中DNA证据的统计解释
如果不涉及通过分析DNA分子对生物痕迹进行法医检查,就无法想象在确定与刑事学和法律诉讼有关的事实方面实施科学方法。明确以DNA证据为依据作出判决的法律规范,完善DNA证据在法庭上的解释和陈述。此外,法官、检察官、律师必须不断地了解和教育法医的基本知识和科学证据的使用,以便正确地了解DNA的结果并作出正确的判断。在最近和过去的经验中,由于缺少一些与统计有关的事实和概率论,导致了某些法律上的遗漏。我们这篇文章的目的是强调概率论和统计学在法医检验中的重要性,特别是在DNA结果的解释中。法官和律师根据他们的推理能力接受证据。一个必要的部分是他们更多地参与和了解法医报告以及解释证据本身的方式。尽可能了解统计证据是律师、法官和检察官的责任。法庭的可采标准必须由法律来确定,统计学和概率论应该向法官详细解释,以便他们做出有效的判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of Firearms in Private Protection Services Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Review of the Legislative Framework and Current Situation Self-Reported Delinquency in Rural Areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina Crime Scene Investigation and Reconstruction – Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics Aspects in North Macedonia Help and Support to Victims of Terrorism – International Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1