The Relation between Return and Volatility in ETFs Traded in Borsa Istanbul: Is There Any Difference between Islamic and Conventional ETFs?

M. Hassan, Selim Kayhana, Tayfur Bayatb
{"title":"The Relation between Return and Volatility in ETFs Traded in Borsa Istanbul: Is There Any Difference between Islamic and Conventional ETFs?","authors":"M. Hassan, Selim Kayhana, Tayfur Bayatb","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3263385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we aim to analyze the relation between return and volatility in different types of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) traded in the Borsa Istanbul. The types we examine are Islamic stock index, conventional stock index, bond, commodity, and U.S. dollar ETFs. We employ the following battery of causality analysis methods that have different statistical advantages to each other: Toda-Yamamoto (1995); bootstrap based Hatemi-J (2005); volatility spillover, which allows investigating causality in variance; frequency domain, which decomposes causality due to different time frequencies; and asymmetric causality, developed by Hatemi-J, which enables finding causation linkages for different types of shocks in each variable. Although the results obtained from our analyses show that a negative relationship between return and volatility is valid for most ETF types, an asymmetric relation running from negative return shocks to positive volatility shocks is valid for only some conventional stock ETFs and U.S. dollar ETFs. On the other hand, Islamic ETFs and commodity ETFs have an asymmetric relation running from positive return shocks to negative volatility shocks. Our results show that the hypotheses investigated in this study vary with the ETF type included in the model.","PeriodicalId":373040,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3263385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this study, we aim to analyze the relation between return and volatility in different types of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) traded in the Borsa Istanbul. The types we examine are Islamic stock index, conventional stock index, bond, commodity, and U.S. dollar ETFs. We employ the following battery of causality analysis methods that have different statistical advantages to each other: Toda-Yamamoto (1995); bootstrap based Hatemi-J (2005); volatility spillover, which allows investigating causality in variance; frequency domain, which decomposes causality due to different time frequencies; and asymmetric causality, developed by Hatemi-J, which enables finding causation linkages for different types of shocks in each variable. Although the results obtained from our analyses show that a negative relationship between return and volatility is valid for most ETF types, an asymmetric relation running from negative return shocks to positive volatility shocks is valid for only some conventional stock ETFs and U.S. dollar ETFs. On the other hand, Islamic ETFs and commodity ETFs have an asymmetric relation running from positive return shocks to negative volatility shocks. Our results show that the hypotheses investigated in this study vary with the ETF type included in the model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯坦布尔证券交易所交易的etf收益与波动的关系:伊斯兰etf与传统etf有区别吗?
在本研究中,我们旨在分析在伊斯坦布尔交易所交易的不同类型的交易所交易基金(etf)的收益与波动率之间的关系。我们研究的类型是伊斯兰股票指数、传统股票指数、债券、商品和美元etf。我们采用了以下一系列因果关系分析方法,这些方法彼此具有不同的统计优势:Toda-Yamamoto (1995);基于bootstrap的Hatemi-J (2005);波动性溢出,允许调查方差中的因果关系;频域,分解因时间频率不同而产生的因果关系;以及由Hatemi-J开发的非对称因果关系,它可以找到每个变量中不同类型冲击的因果关系。虽然我们的分析结果表明,收益和波动率之间的负相关关系对大多数ETF类型有效,但从负收益冲击到正波动率冲击的非对称关系仅对一些传统的股票ETF和美元ETF有效。另一方面,伊斯兰etf与商品etf具有从正收益冲击到负波动冲击的不对称关系。我们的研究结果表明,本研究的假设随着模型中所包含的ETF类型的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Growth and Financial Performance of Islamic Banks: A CAMELS Approach Organic Global Cryptocurrency: Towards a Stable International Monetary System that is Closer to Maqasid Sharıʿah Service Quality of Islamic Banks: Satisfaction, Loyalty and the Mediating Role of Trust The Business Financial Inclusion Benefits From an Islamic Point of View: A Qualitative Inquiry A Model of the Islamic Sovereign Wealth Fund
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1