요양병원인증제 전·후의 요양병원 임상영양관리 현황 비교

이창희, 이수경
{"title":"요양병원인증제 전·후의 요양병원 임상영양관리 현황 비교","authors":"이창희, 이수경","doi":"10.14373/JKDA.2014.20.3.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing elderly population has created an urgent need for well-managed convalescent hospitals, which should provide appropriate clinical nutrition services. The new accreditation policy requiring participation of all convalescent hospitals since 2013 may promote improvement of clinical nutrition services. This study examined whether or not the accreditation policy has increased practice level and dietitians` perception of the importance of clinical nutrition management. Of the 177 convalescent hospitals accredited by January 30, 2014, dietitians from 73 hospitals (41.2%) completed the survey questionnaire. The pre-tested questionnaire surveyed general characteristics of the hospital and dietitians, current status of clinical nutrition management, and changes in the perception and practice levels of various aspects of food and clinical nutrition management. In average, dietitians with more than 5 years of work experience (68.1%) provided food and clinical nutrition services (71.2%). After accreditation, dietitians` perception of the importance and practice level of clinical nutrition service increased (P¼0.001). Level of perception, however, was significantly (P¼0.001) higher than practice level before and after accreditation. During perception and practice level of initial nutrition assessment, a compulsory accreditation item, notably and significantly (P¼0.001) improved after accreditation. The significant difference between perception and practice level disappeared after accreditation. In conclusion, the accreditation process had positive effects on clinical nutrition management in terms of dietitians` perception and practice levels. Making more accreditation items compulsory and providing motivation and professional education to dietitians in convalescent hospitals could lead to additional improvements.","PeriodicalId":438121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2014.20.3.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The increasing elderly population has created an urgent need for well-managed convalescent hospitals, which should provide appropriate clinical nutrition services. The new accreditation policy requiring participation of all convalescent hospitals since 2013 may promote improvement of clinical nutrition services. This study examined whether or not the accreditation policy has increased practice level and dietitians` perception of the importance of clinical nutrition management. Of the 177 convalescent hospitals accredited by January 30, 2014, dietitians from 73 hospitals (41.2%) completed the survey questionnaire. The pre-tested questionnaire surveyed general characteristics of the hospital and dietitians, current status of clinical nutrition management, and changes in the perception and practice levels of various aspects of food and clinical nutrition management. In average, dietitians with more than 5 years of work experience (68.1%) provided food and clinical nutrition services (71.2%). After accreditation, dietitians` perception of the importance and practice level of clinical nutrition service increased (P¼0.001). Level of perception, however, was significantly (P¼0.001) higher than practice level before and after accreditation. During perception and practice level of initial nutrition assessment, a compulsory accreditation item, notably and significantly (P¼0.001) improved after accreditation. The significant difference between perception and practice level disappeared after accreditation. In conclusion, the accreditation process had positive effects on clinical nutrition management in terms of dietitians` perception and practice levels. Making more accreditation items compulsory and providing motivation and professional education to dietitians in convalescent hospitals could lead to additional improvements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较疗养医院认证制前后疗养医院临床营养管理现状
老年人口不断增加,迫切需要管理良好的康复医院,这些医院应提供适当的临床营养服务。2013年起要求所有康复医院参与的新认证政策可能会促进临床营养服务的改善。本研究考察了认证政策是否提高了实践水平和营养师对临床营养管理重要性的认识。在截至2014年1月30日认可的177家康复医院中,有73家医院(41.2%)的营养师完成了问卷调查。预测问卷调查了医院和营养师的一般特点、临床营养管理的现状以及对食品和临床营养管理各方面的认知和实践水平的变化。平均而言,拥有5年以上工作经验的营养师(68.1%)提供食物及临床营养服务(71.2%)。经认证后,营养师对临床营养服务重要性的认知和实践水平均有所提高(P < 0.001)。然而,认知水平显著(P < 0.001)高于认可前后的实践水平。在初始营养评估的认知和实践水平中,一项强制性认证项目在认证后显著提高(P < 0.001)。认知水平与实践水平的显著差异在认证后消失。总之,就营养师的认知和实践水平而言,认证过程对临床营养管理有积极的影响。使更多的认证项目成为强制性的,并为康复医院的营养师提供激励和专业教育,可能会带来更多的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying the Causes of Nutrition Inadequacy in Vietnamese Married Immigrant Women and Korean Spouses through Qualitative Research Factors Related to the Self-Rated Health Status among Korean Elderly: Analysis of the 2016 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Study on the Relationship between the Nutrient Intake and Level of Depressive Symptoms: Using the Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2016 Level of Nutrition Knowledge, Diet Practice and Education Demands in Dialysis Patients with Chronic Renal Failure Depression and Related Risk Factors in the Elderly with a Focused on Health Habits, Mental Health, Chronic Diseases, and Nutrient Intake Status: Data from the 2014 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1