Co-innovation and Integration and Implementation Sciences: Measuring their research impact - examination of five New Zealand primary sector case studies

B. Small, Melissa Robson-Williams, Penny R. Payne, J. Turner, Roger Robson-Williams, A. Horita
{"title":"Co-innovation and Integration and Implementation Sciences: Measuring their research impact - examination of five New Zealand primary sector case studies","authors":"B. Small, Melissa Robson-Williams, Penny R. Payne, J. Turner, Roger Robson-Williams, A. Horita","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2021.1957267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Primary Innovation programme investigated co-innovation to solve complex agricultural problems in five New Zealand primary sector projects. The projects engaged diverse stakeholders using a collaborative, integrative process to co-define problems, and co-create and implement solutions. Each project included a Reflexive Monitor, who facilitated group relationships, encouraged a systems perspective, and integration of multiple disciplinary and stakeholder knowledges. Reflexive Monitors also encouraged reflexive practice and adaptive project management, while helping the team pursue the project ambition for change. This paper, with respect to the five projects, seeks to address the following research question: Is co-innovation an effective research approach for achieving societal impact from innovations? To address this question, we describe attempts to operationalise and measure co-innovation through 1) five behavioural principles of co-innovation, 2) Reflexive Monitors’ focus on each principle, and 3) the presence or absence of elements of the Integration and Implementation Sciences Framework (i2S) for enhancing research impact. We evaluate the relationship between these three process measures and project success, measured by outputs and two proxy impact measures: participants’ subjective comparisons with the counterfactual and anticipated achievement of desired long-term impacts. Results indicated that the five principles of co-innovation and the presence or absence of elements defined in the i2S framework were positively related to the three success measures. This suggests validity of these measurement tools, and of using a co-innovation approach and/or systematic attention to the elements of the i2S framework to enhance the processes, outcomes and impacts of projects tackling complex real-world problems.","PeriodicalId":211218,"journal":{"name":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2021.1957267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Primary Innovation programme investigated co-innovation to solve complex agricultural problems in five New Zealand primary sector projects. The projects engaged diverse stakeholders using a collaborative, integrative process to co-define problems, and co-create and implement solutions. Each project included a Reflexive Monitor, who facilitated group relationships, encouraged a systems perspective, and integration of multiple disciplinary and stakeholder knowledges. Reflexive Monitors also encouraged reflexive practice and adaptive project management, while helping the team pursue the project ambition for change. This paper, with respect to the five projects, seeks to address the following research question: Is co-innovation an effective research approach for achieving societal impact from innovations? To address this question, we describe attempts to operationalise and measure co-innovation through 1) five behavioural principles of co-innovation, 2) Reflexive Monitors’ focus on each principle, and 3) the presence or absence of elements of the Integration and Implementation Sciences Framework (i2S) for enhancing research impact. We evaluate the relationship between these three process measures and project success, measured by outputs and two proxy impact measures: participants’ subjective comparisons with the counterfactual and anticipated achievement of desired long-term impacts. Results indicated that the five principles of co-innovation and the presence or absence of elements defined in the i2S framework were positively related to the three success measures. This suggests validity of these measurement tools, and of using a co-innovation approach and/or systematic attention to the elements of the i2S framework to enhance the processes, outcomes and impacts of projects tackling complex real-world problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同创新与整合与实施科学:衡量其研究影响——对新西兰五个初级部门案例研究的考察
初级创新项目调查了共同创新来解决新西兰五个初级部门项目中复杂的农业问题。这些项目使用协作的、集成的过程来共同定义问题,共同创建和实现解决方案,从而使不同的涉众参与其中。每个项目都包括一个反思性监督员,他促进了小组关系,鼓励系统观点,以及多学科和利益相关者知识的整合。反思性监视器还鼓励反思性实践和适应性项目管理,同时帮助团队实现变更的项目目标。本文针对这五个项目,试图解决以下研究问题:共同创新是实现创新的社会影响的有效研究方法吗?为了解决这个问题,我们描述了通过以下方式来实施和衡量共同创新的尝试:1)共同创新的五个行为原则,2)反思性监测对每个原则的关注,以及3)集成与实施科学框架(i2S)中增强研究影响的要素的存在或缺失。我们评估了这三个过程度量与项目成功之间的关系,通过产出和两个代理影响度量来衡量:参与者与期望的长期影响的反事实和预期成就的主观比较。结果表明,五项共同创新原则和i2S框架中定义的要素的存在与否与三项成功指标呈正相关。这表明了这些测量工具的有效性,以及使用共同创新方法和/或系统地关注i2S框架的要素来增强解决复杂现实问题的项目的过程、结果和影响的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatially scaled and customised daily light integral maps for horticulture lighting design From fix to fitting: Connecting low-emission development with multilevel smallholder dairy practices in Kenya Risk coping strategies of typical and entrepreneurial smallholder dairy farmers in Ethiopia Facets of value emerging through the operation of short food supply chains From experiment to market development: A case study of prospects and value chain of saline agriculture in Terschelling, the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1