When do diagrams enhance learning? A framework for designing relevant representations

Jodi L. Davenport, D. Yaron, D. Klahr, K. Koedinger
{"title":"When do diagrams enhance learning? A framework for designing relevant representations","authors":"Jodi L. Davenport, D. Yaron, D. Klahr, K. Koedinger","doi":"10.1184/R1/6619145.V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many studies demonstrate large learning gains when instruction includes diagrams, diagrams do not always lead to improved outcomes. How can instructional designers know whether a given diagram will enhance learning? We have developed a framework of three factors that influence the effectiveness of a diagram in a particular learning situation: the learning objective, the design of the visual representation and the cognitive processing of the learner. In a randomized-design study conducted in a college chemistry class, we found that instruction that included diagrams created with this framework led to enhanced performance on open-ended transfer items compared to traditional instruction, particularly for low-performing students. We propose that a concept-based cognitive theory of multimedia learning that includes a conceptual working memory component may explain why the efficacy of diagrams depends heavily on the prior knowledge of the learner as well as the conceptual information available in the representation.","PeriodicalId":145751,"journal":{"name":"International Conference of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6619145.V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Although many studies demonstrate large learning gains when instruction includes diagrams, diagrams do not always lead to improved outcomes. How can instructional designers know whether a given diagram will enhance learning? We have developed a framework of three factors that influence the effectiveness of a diagram in a particular learning situation: the learning objective, the design of the visual representation and the cognitive processing of the learner. In a randomized-design study conducted in a college chemistry class, we found that instruction that included diagrams created with this framework led to enhanced performance on open-ended transfer items compared to traditional instruction, particularly for low-performing students. We propose that a concept-based cognitive theory of multimedia learning that includes a conceptual working memory component may explain why the efficacy of diagrams depends heavily on the prior knowledge of the learner as well as the conceptual information available in the representation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图表什么时候能促进学习?设计相关表示的框架
尽管许多研究表明,当教学中包含图表时,学习效果会很大,但图表并不总是导致改进的结果。教学设计师如何知道一个给定的图表是否会促进学习?我们已经开发了一个框架,在特定的学习情况下,影响图表有效性的三个因素:学习目标,视觉表现的设计和学习者的认知加工。在一项对大学化学课进行的随机设计研究中,我们发现,与传统教学相比,包含基于该框架创建的图表的教学能提高学生在开放式迁移项目上的表现,尤其是对表现不佳的学生。我们提出一个基于概念的多媒体学习认知理论,其中包括概念工作记忆成分,可以解释为什么图表的有效性在很大程度上取决于学习者的先验知识以及表征中可用的概念信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Literacies and Social Justice: Exploring Critical Data Literacies through Sociocultural Perspectives Robot Block-based Coding in Preschool Teachers' Conceptualizations of Computational and Mathematical Thinking Encouraging Revision of Scientific Ideas with Critique in an Online Genetics Unit Filling in the Gaps: Capturing Social Regulation in an Interactive Tabletop Learning Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1