Survival outcomes with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil regimen for the treatment of metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: A single-center experience

P. Patil, V. Gupta, R. Rangaraju, Waseem Abbas, R. Acharya, Archit Pandit
{"title":"Survival outcomes with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil regimen for the treatment of metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: A single-center experience","authors":"P. Patil, V. Gupta, R. Rangaraju, Waseem Abbas, R. Acharya, Archit Pandit","doi":"10.4103/oji.oji_8_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma have a relatively poor prognosis with a median survival of 6 months. The three-drug regimen of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil (DOF) has been shown to improve survival compared to the two-drug regimen of docetaxel and oxaliplatin with similar toxicity. However, there is no published Indian experience with this regimen. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of DOF regimen for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma patients in Indian settings. Materials and Methods: All patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who were treated with DOF regimen chemotherapy at our tertiary care center in North India from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The DOF regimen consisted of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion over 46 h; (cycle repeated at two weekly intervals until progression or unacceptable toxicity). The endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS, which were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Fifteen patients with a median age of 52 years were identified; 73% were male. ORR was seen in 86.7% of patients (complete response: 20%, partial response: 60%, and stable disease: 6.7%) and progressive disease was seen in 13.3% of patients. With a median follow-up of 14 months, the median PFS was 7 months and the median OS was 16 months from the start of therapy. One-year PFS was 22% and 1- and 2-year OS was 79% and 26%, respectively. The most frequent Grades 3–4 adverse events in our patients being mucositis (33.3%), neutropenia (26.7%), and diarrhea (20%). Conclusion: DOF regimen is an effective and feasible regimen in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.","PeriodicalId":431823,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Journal of India","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/oji.oji_8_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma have a relatively poor prognosis with a median survival of 6 months. The three-drug regimen of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil (DOF) has been shown to improve survival compared to the two-drug regimen of docetaxel and oxaliplatin with similar toxicity. However, there is no published Indian experience with this regimen. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of DOF regimen for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma patients in Indian settings. Materials and Methods: All patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who were treated with DOF regimen chemotherapy at our tertiary care center in North India from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The DOF regimen consisted of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion over 46 h; (cycle repeated at two weekly intervals until progression or unacceptable toxicity). The endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS, which were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Fifteen patients with a median age of 52 years were identified; 73% were male. ORR was seen in 86.7% of patients (complete response: 20%, partial response: 60%, and stable disease: 6.7%) and progressive disease was seen in 13.3% of patients. With a median follow-up of 14 months, the median PFS was 7 months and the median OS was 16 months from the start of therapy. One-year PFS was 22% and 1- and 2-year OS was 79% and 26%, respectively. The most frequent Grades 3–4 adverse events in our patients being mucositis (33.3%), neutropenia (26.7%), and diarrhea (20%). Conclusion: DOF regimen is an effective and feasible regimen in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多西紫杉醇、奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶方案治疗转移性胃腺癌的生存结局:单中心经验
背景:转移性胃腺癌患者预后相对较差,中位生存期为6个月。与多西紫杉醇、奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶(DOF)的两药方案相比,多西紫杉醇、奥沙利铂的三药方案已被证明可以提高生存率,但毒性相似。然而,印度并没有发表过这种疗法的经验。目的:本研究的目的是评估DOF方案对印度转移性胃腺癌患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的疗效。材料与方法:回顾性分析2014 - 2018年在印度北部三级医疗中心接受DOF方案化疗的所有转移性胃腺癌患者。DOF方案为:第1天多西他赛50 mg/m2,第1天奥沙利铂85 mg/m2, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2连续静脉输注46 h;(每两周重复一次,直至出现不可接受的毒性)。终点为总有效率(ORR)、PFS和OS,采用Kaplan-Meier分析进行评估。结果:15例患者,中位年龄52岁;73%为男性。86.7%的患者出现ORR(完全缓解:20%,部分缓解:60%,病情稳定:6.7%),13.3%的患者出现进展性疾病。中位随访14个月,治疗开始后中位PFS为7个月,中位OS为16个月。1年PFS为22%,1年和2年OS分别为79%和26%。我们的患者中最常见的3-4级不良事件是粘膜炎(33.3%)、中性粒细胞减少(26.7%)和腹泻(20%)。结论:DOF治疗转移性胃癌是一种有效可行的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma of the thyroid: A rare case Burned-out testicular tumor presenting as cervical and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy Nasal sebaceous carcinoma: A case treated at a tertiary care center Xanthogranulomatous hypophysitis masquerading as pituitary macroadenoma Cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab with or without prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer institute at Guwahati, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1