PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI GURU SEBAGAI TENAGA PROFESIONAL BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN

Sapto Budoyo
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI GURU SEBAGAI TENAGA PROFESIONAL BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN","authors":"Sapto Budoyo","doi":"10.26877/m-y.v5i1.11575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of various cases that befell teachers in carrying out their professional duties is proof that legal protection for the teaching profession has not been running properly. This study consists of 3 (three) main problems, including legal protection for teachers as professionals, the weaknesses of legal protection for teachers as professionals, and efforts to realize legal protection for teachers as professionals based on the value of justice. This study uses a normative legal method by using a literature study. The results of this study state that the legal protection of the teaching profession as a professional educator is currently regulated in Law no. 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System and Law no. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers. Weaknesses in the legal protection of teachers as professionals, namely the teaching profession do not yet have the right not to be prosecuted in carrying out their professional duties and many cases go to the police (criminal), civil courts, and even state administrative courts. Efforts to realize the protection of teachers as professionals based on the value of justice through the reconstruction of articles 39 and 44 of Law no. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers relating to the principle that teachers cannot be prosecuted either civilly, administratively, or criminally in carrying out their professional duties in good faith and or pedagogical principles for the benefit of education in the learning process. ","PeriodicalId":167603,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Meta-Yuridis","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Meta-Yuridis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v5i1.11575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of various cases that befell teachers in carrying out their professional duties is proof that legal protection for the teaching profession has not been running properly. This study consists of 3 (three) main problems, including legal protection for teachers as professionals, the weaknesses of legal protection for teachers as professionals, and efforts to realize legal protection for teachers as professionals based on the value of justice. This study uses a normative legal method by using a literature study. The results of this study state that the legal protection of the teaching profession as a professional educator is currently regulated in Law no. 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System and Law no. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers. Weaknesses in the legal protection of teachers as professionals, namely the teaching profession do not yet have the right not to be prosecuted in carrying out their professional duties and many cases go to the police (criminal), civil courts, and even state administrative courts. Efforts to realize the protection of teachers as professionals based on the value of justice through the reconstruction of articles 39 and 44 of Law no. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers relating to the principle that teachers cannot be prosecuted either civilly, administratively, or criminally in carrying out their professional duties in good faith and or pedagogical principles for the benefit of education in the learning process. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师作为基于正义价值的专业人员的法律保护
教师在履行其专业职责时遭遇的各种案件的增多,证明了对教师职业的法律保护并没有正常运行。本研究主要包括3个主要问题,即对教师专业身份的法律保护,对教师专业身份法律保护的薄弱环节,以及如何实现基于正义价值的教师专业身份法律保护。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,采用文献研究法。这项研究的结果表明,作为专业教育工作者的教师职业的法律保护目前在第2号法律中有规定。关于国家教育制度的2003年第20号法律。2005年第14号关于教师和讲师的决议。教师作为专业人员的法律保护存在不足,即教师在履行其专业职责时还没有不被起诉的权利,许多案件都要诉诸警察(刑事)、民事法院,甚至国家行政法院。通过对第39条和第44条的重构,努力实现对教师作为专业人员的正义价值保护。2005年第14号关于教师和讲师的条例,涉及教师在履行其专业职责时不应受到民事、行政或刑事起诉的原则,以及在学习过程中为教育利益而遵循的教学原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA SETELAH PUTUSAN MK No 18/PUU-XVII/2019 DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG ASPEK HUKUM TERHADAP PERAN PSIKOLOGI FORENSIK DALAM PENANGANAN PELAKU KEJAHATAN TINDAK PIDANA DITINJAU PADA HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA TERHADAP PENYESATAN ASAL DAERAH SUATU BARANG PENERAPAN HUKUM WARIS PADA MASYARAKAT SEDULUR SIKEP DESA BATUREJO ANALISIS AKIBAT HUKUM PERCERAIAN TERHADAP HARTA BERSAMA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SEMARANG (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA NOMOR 3122 TAHUN 2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1