Using Dependency Relations to Improve Test Case Generation from UML Statecharts

V. Chimisliu, F. Wotawa
{"title":"Using Dependency Relations to Improve Test Case Generation from UML Statecharts","authors":"V. Chimisliu, F. Wotawa","doi":"10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In model-based testing the size of the used model has a great impact on the time for computing test cases. In model checking, dependence relations have been used in slicing of specifications in order to obtain reduced models pertinent to criteria of interest. In specifications described using state based formalisms slicing involves the removal of transitions and merging of states thus obtaining a structural modified specification. Using such a specification for model based test case generation where sequences of transitions represent test cases might provide traces that are not valid on a correctly behaving implementation. In order to avoid such trouble, we suggest the use of control, data and communication dependences for identifying parts of the model that can be excluded so that the remaining specification can be safely employed for test case generation. This information is included in test purposes which are then used in the test case generation process. We present also first empirical results obtained by using several models from industry and literature.","PeriodicalId":152957,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In model-based testing the size of the used model has a great impact on the time for computing test cases. In model checking, dependence relations have been used in slicing of specifications in order to obtain reduced models pertinent to criteria of interest. In specifications described using state based formalisms slicing involves the removal of transitions and merging of states thus obtaining a structural modified specification. Using such a specification for model based test case generation where sequences of transitions represent test cases might provide traces that are not valid on a correctly behaving implementation. In order to avoid such trouble, we suggest the use of control, data and communication dependences for identifying parts of the model that can be excluded so that the remaining specification can be safely employed for test case generation. This information is included in test purposes which are then used in the test case generation process. We present also first empirical results obtained by using several models from industry and literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用依赖关系改进UML状态图中的测试用例生成
在基于模型的测试中,使用的模型的大小对计算测试用例的时间有很大的影响。在模型检查中,为了获得与感兴趣的标准相关的简化模型,在规范切片中使用了依赖关系。在使用基于状态的形式化描述的规范中,切片涉及到移除转换和合并状态,从而获得结构修改的规范。使用这样一个基于模型的测试用例生成规范,其中转换序列表示测试用例,可能会提供在正确行为的实现上无效的跟踪。为了避免这样的麻烦,我们建议使用控制、数据和通信依赖来识别模型中可以排除的部分,以便剩余的规范可以安全地用于测试用例生成。该信息包含在测试目的中,然后在测试用例生成过程中使用。我们还介绍了通过使用来自行业和文献的几个模型获得的第一个实证结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Patrol Guidance Mechanism in a Context-Aware Environment Investigating the Relevance of Linked Open Data Sets with SPARQL Queries A Distributed Protective Approach for Multiechelon Supply Systems Model Checking for SpaceWire Link Interface Design Using Uppaal An Optimal Route Selection Mechanism for Outbound Connection on IPv6 Site Multihoming Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1