Integration of survey data and digital footprints: an overview of the main methodological approaches

Anastasia Saponova, S. Kulikov
{"title":"Integration of survey data and digital footprints: an overview of the main methodological approaches","authors":"Anastasia Saponova, S. Kulikov","doi":"10.19181/4m.2021.53.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of current study is to review the main existing methodological approaches to the integration of survey data and digital traces that are used in sociological research. The paper examines key arguments in the current methodological discussion about the place of big digital data in contemporary social science research. The authors make an attempt to scrutinize the practice of integrating survey data and digital traces through the concept of “reactive – nonreactive” measurement. The possible functions of digital traces in the design of the study are indicated (on the example of social media data). On the example of three research areas (the study of media consumption, media effects and electoral behavior) general methodological principles for integrating data of different nature are demonstrated and possible prospects for the development of these approaches is described. The article discusses a wide range of methodological issues: problems of the data linking validity; potential threats to the validity of digital traces; opportunities to improve survey questionnaire, to enrich data, to search for new valid indicators of socio-political processes and to provide cross-validation of research results. The current practices of integrating administrative data are considered as well.","PeriodicalId":271863,"journal":{"name":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2021.53.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of current study is to review the main existing methodological approaches to the integration of survey data and digital traces that are used in sociological research. The paper examines key arguments in the current methodological discussion about the place of big digital data in contemporary social science research. The authors make an attempt to scrutinize the practice of integrating survey data and digital traces through the concept of “reactive – nonreactive” measurement. The possible functions of digital traces in the design of the study are indicated (on the example of social media data). On the example of three research areas (the study of media consumption, media effects and electoral behavior) general methodological principles for integrating data of different nature are demonstrated and possible prospects for the development of these approaches is described. The article discusses a wide range of methodological issues: problems of the data linking validity; potential threats to the validity of digital traces; opportunities to improve survey questionnaire, to enrich data, to search for new valid indicators of socio-political processes and to provide cross-validation of research results. The current practices of integrating administrative data are considered as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查数据和数字足迹的整合:主要方法方法的概述
本研究的主要目的是回顾社会学研究中使用的调查数据和数字痕迹整合的主要现有方法。本文考察了当前关于大数字数据在当代社会科学研究中的地位的方法论讨论中的关键论点。作者试图通过“无反应-无反应”测量的概念来审视整合调查数据和数字痕迹的实践。指出了数字痕迹在研究设计中的可能作用(以社交媒体数据为例)。以三个研究领域(媒体消费、媒体效应和选举行为研究)为例,展示了整合不同性质数据的一般方法原则,并描述了这些方法发展的可能前景。本文讨论了广泛的方法论问题:数据链接有效性问题;对数字痕迹有效性的潜在威胁;有机会改进调查问卷,丰富数据,寻找社会政治进程的新有效指标,并对研究结果进行交叉验证。还考虑了目前整合行政数据的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative social network analysis in practice: comparison of methods for network maps construction Experience of implementing discourse analysis and conceptual mapping of healthy eating communities Typology of professional trajectories of gifted individuals using neural network analysis Topic modeling for short texts: comparative analysis of algorithms Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1