{"title":"The Struggle for Meaning","authors":"J. L. Collins, Earl Seidman","doi":"10.1515/9780823296859-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost everything that goes on in a classroom is shaped, expressed, and reflected by our use of language. Yet, because language is so pervasive and at the same time so habitual and, except where recorded, so fleeting, we tend to be unaware of the inextricable relationships between the use of language in our classrooms and our students' learning. A key to understanding those relationships is implicit in E. M. Forester's phrase \"only connect.\" Teachers \"connect\" with students by what they say so that their inner worlds of experience somehow make sense and become a part of the students' experience. The conduit between their experience and the experience of the teacher and subject matter is their own thinking process. Teachers tend to assume that if they speak words whose socially accepted meaning is clear there will be little problem for students in making the connection between those socially agreed upon meanings and personal meaningfulness. But that vital connection can never be assumed. For words to be full of meaning their conventional meanings must be infused by the personal experience and thought of the student. Teachers can try to facilitate, encourage, support, and guide that crucial connecting process, but they can not do it for the student. Making meaning requires that students connect their inner personal world of motivation and thought with the outer social world which they perceive and experience. Learning requires that, in the end, students make meaning for themselves. It is through actual language use that students are able to make the connection between their inner personal worlds and the external","PeriodicalId":345470,"journal":{"name":"The Human and the Holy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Human and the Holy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823296859-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Almost everything that goes on in a classroom is shaped, expressed, and reflected by our use of language. Yet, because language is so pervasive and at the same time so habitual and, except where recorded, so fleeting, we tend to be unaware of the inextricable relationships between the use of language in our classrooms and our students' learning. A key to understanding those relationships is implicit in E. M. Forester's phrase "only connect." Teachers "connect" with students by what they say so that their inner worlds of experience somehow make sense and become a part of the students' experience. The conduit between their experience and the experience of the teacher and subject matter is their own thinking process. Teachers tend to assume that if they speak words whose socially accepted meaning is clear there will be little problem for students in making the connection between those socially agreed upon meanings and personal meaningfulness. But that vital connection can never be assumed. For words to be full of meaning their conventional meanings must be infused by the personal experience and thought of the student. Teachers can try to facilitate, encourage, support, and guide that crucial connecting process, but they can not do it for the student. Making meaning requires that students connect their inner personal world of motivation and thought with the outer social world which they perceive and experience. Learning requires that, in the end, students make meaning for themselves. It is through actual language use that students are able to make the connection between their inner personal worlds and the external
课堂上发生的几乎所有事情都是由我们对语言的使用来塑造、表达和反映的。然而,由于语言是如此普遍,同时也是如此习惯,除了有记录的地方,它是如此短暂,我们往往没有意识到课堂上语言的使用与学生的学习之间有着不可分割的关系。理解这些关系的关键隐含在E. M. Forester的短语“只联系”中。教师通过他们所说的话与学生“联系”起来,这样他们的内心世界就会变得有意义,并成为学生经历的一部分。他们的经验与教师的经验和主题之间的管道是他们自己的思维过程。教师倾向于认为,如果他们说的词的社会公认的意义是明确的,那么学生在建立这些社会公认的意义和个人意义之间的联系方面就不会有什么问题。但这种至关重要的联系永远不能假设。要使单词充满意义,就必须给它们的传统意义注入学生的个人经验和思想。教师可以尝试促进、鼓励、支持和指导这个关键的联系过程,但他们不能为学生做这些。创造意义要求学生将他们内在的个人动机和思想世界与他们感知和体验的外部社会世界联系起来。学习要求学生最终为自己创造意义。正是通过实际的语言使用,学生们能够在他们的内心世界和外部世界之间建立联系