The adoption of innovations in Brazilian labour courts from the perspective of judges and court managers

Marcos de Moraes Sousa , Tomas de Aquino Guimaraes
{"title":"The adoption of innovations in Brazilian labour courts from the perspective of judges and court managers","authors":"Marcos de Moraes Sousa ,&nbsp;Tomas de Aquino Guimaraes","doi":"10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a lack of studies upon the innovation process in the judiciary. To contribute to filling this gap, this study aims to describe the perceptions of the Brazilian labour courts’ judges and managers related to resources and capabilities associated with the development and adoption of innovation, represented by the electronic lawsuit, and the impact on Court's performance and factors that facilitate or hinder the adoption of innovations. A document analysis and 35 interviews were conducted – nine with judges and 26 with court managers – and the data were analyzed using a content analysis with <em>a priori</em> categorization. The results show the following: (i) the process of development and adoption of innovation occurs in three ways – centralized in higher bodies, through partnerships with other courts or through internal development; (ii) there are important resources and capabilities internal to courts and inter-organizational routines associated with the innovation process; and (iii) innovation contributes to the development and integration of other innovations and changes in working routines. Additionally, barriers to and facilitators of the innovation adoption process are discussed and a research agenda is stated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30471,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"52 1","pages":"Pages 103-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.008","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S008021071630735X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

There is a lack of studies upon the innovation process in the judiciary. To contribute to filling this gap, this study aims to describe the perceptions of the Brazilian labour courts’ judges and managers related to resources and capabilities associated with the development and adoption of innovation, represented by the electronic lawsuit, and the impact on Court's performance and factors that facilitate or hinder the adoption of innovations. A document analysis and 35 interviews were conducted – nine with judges and 26 with court managers – and the data were analyzed using a content analysis with a priori categorization. The results show the following: (i) the process of development and adoption of innovation occurs in three ways – centralized in higher bodies, through partnerships with other courts or through internal development; (ii) there are important resources and capabilities internal to courts and inter-organizational routines associated with the innovation process; and (iii) innovation contributes to the development and integration of other innovations and changes in working routines. Additionally, barriers to and facilitators of the innovation adoption process are discussed and a research agenda is stated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从法官和法院管理人员的角度来看,巴西劳工法庭采用了创新措施
对司法创新过程的研究较少。为了填补这一空白,本研究旨在描述巴西劳动法院法官和管理人员对与发展和采用创新(以电子诉讼为代表)相关的资源和能力的看法,以及对法院绩效的影响和促进或阻碍采用创新的因素。进行了文件分析和35次访谈——9次与法官交谈,26次与法院管理人员交谈——并使用具有先验分类的内容分析来分析数据。结果表明:(i)发展和采用创新的过程以三种方式发生-由上级机构集中,通过与其他法院的伙伴关系或通过内部发展;(ii)法院内部有重要的资源和能力以及与创新过程相关的组织间惯例;(三)创新有助于发展和整合其他创新和工作惯例的变化。此外,还讨论了创新采用过程的障碍和促进因素,并提出了研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Formal and relational contracts between organizations: proposal of a model for analysis of the transactional and governance structure characteristics of comparative cases The use of dynamic capabilities to boost innovation in a Brazilian Chemical Company Investigating the deal making failure in M&A: deal makers’ perspective in Brazil What motivates money donation? A study on external motivators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1