Automated identification of discourse markers using NLP approach: The case of okay

Abdulaziz Sanosi, Mohamed Abdalla
{"title":"Automated identification of discourse markers using NLP approach: The case of okay","authors":"Abdulaziz Sanosi, Mohamed Abdalla","doi":"10.29140/ajal.v4n3.538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the potentials of the NLP approach in detecting discourse markers (DMs), namely okay, in transcribed spoken data. One hundred thirty-eight concordance lines were presented to human referees to judge the functions of okay in them as a DM or Non-DM. After that, the researchers used a Python script written according to the POS tagging scheme of the NLTK library to set rules for identifying cases where okay is used as non-DM. The output of the script was compared to the reference human-annotated data. The results showed that the script could accurately identify the function of okay as DM or non-DM in 92% of the cases. The inaccuracy of detecting the rest was found to be caused by a lack of proper and detailed punctuations. The main implications of the results are that new NLP approaches can detect DMS; however, proper punctuation is required to enable the proper identification of DMs. In accordance with the findings, the researcher recommended adopting the approach after conducting further comprehensive studies.","PeriodicalId":220888,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v4n3.538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the potentials of the NLP approach in detecting discourse markers (DMs), namely okay, in transcribed spoken data. One hundred thirty-eight concordance lines were presented to human referees to judge the functions of okay in them as a DM or Non-DM. After that, the researchers used a Python script written according to the POS tagging scheme of the NLTK library to set rules for identifying cases where okay is used as non-DM. The output of the script was compared to the reference human-annotated data. The results showed that the script could accurately identify the function of okay as DM or non-DM in 92% of the cases. The inaccuracy of detecting the rest was found to be caused by a lack of proper and detailed punctuations. The main implications of the results are that new NLP approaches can detect DMS; however, proper punctuation is required to enable the proper identification of DMs. In accordance with the findings, the researcher recommended adopting the approach after conducting further comprehensive studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用NLP方法自动识别话语标记:ok的情况
本研究旨在研究NLP方法在检测话语标记(DMs)方面的潜力,即在转录的口语数据中。138条协和线被提交给人类裁判,以判断okay在其中作为糖尿病或非糖尿病的功能。之后,研究人员使用根据NLTK库的POS标记方案编写的Python脚本来设置规则,以识别okay被用作非dm的情况。将脚本的输出与人工注释的参考数据进行比较。结果表明,在92%的病例中,该脚本可以准确地识别出okay的功能为DM或非DM。发现其余部分的不准确是由于缺乏适当和详细的标点符号造成的。结果的主要含义是新的NLP方法可以检测DMS;但是,需要适当的标点符号才能正确识别dm。根据研究结果,研究人员建议在进行进一步的综合研究后采用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing pedagogical practices: Insights from novice and experienced English language teachers Review of Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition Enacting teacher emotion, agency, and professional identity: A netnography of a novice Chinese language teacher’s crisis teaching Review of Rethinking Language Policy YouTube for second language learning: What does the research tell us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1