Simulation Based Performance Evaluation of Several Active Queue Management Algorithms for Computer Network

Omar Almomani, Adeeb Saaidah, Firas Al Balas, L. Al-Qaisi
{"title":"Simulation Based Performance Evaluation of Several Active Queue Management Algorithms for Computer Network","authors":"Omar Almomani, Adeeb Saaidah, Firas Al Balas, L. Al-Qaisi","doi":"10.1109/IACS.2019.8809117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congestion crumbles the network performance, therefore. This paper evaluates several Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms which used to control congestion. The main Objective of the paper is to find optimal algorithm that can be use to avoid congestion. AQM are router based mechanism which can detect congestion in early stage in the network ask the transmitter to decrease its transmitting rate, in this way the network can control the congestion for incoming packets. So some of AQM algorithms were evaluated by analyzed their performance, the selected AQM algorithms are Gentle BLUE (GB), Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED), Effective Random Early Detection (ERED), BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold algorithms. Performance evaluation is carried by using JAVA simulation environments. Evaluation results show that GB compared with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold outperformed in terms of mean queue length, delay and packet loss. GB had maximum dropping probability as compare with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold. In term of throughput all tested algorithms all most give same throughput. The results prove that the GB is can be appropriate algorithm to handle congestion as compare to DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold.","PeriodicalId":225697,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2019.8809117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Congestion crumbles the network performance, therefore. This paper evaluates several Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms which used to control congestion. The main Objective of the paper is to find optimal algorithm that can be use to avoid congestion. AQM are router based mechanism which can detect congestion in early stage in the network ask the transmitter to decrease its transmitting rate, in this way the network can control the congestion for incoming packets. So some of AQM algorithms were evaluated by analyzed their performance, the selected AQM algorithms are Gentle BLUE (GB), Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED), Effective Random Early Detection (ERED), BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold algorithms. Performance evaluation is carried by using JAVA simulation environments. Evaluation results show that GB compared with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold outperformed in terms of mean queue length, delay and packet loss. GB had maximum dropping probability as compare with DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold. In term of throughput all tested algorithms all most give same throughput. The results prove that the GB is can be appropriate algorithm to handle congestion as compare to DGRED, ERED, BLUE and Adaptive Max Threshold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于仿真的几种计算机网络主动队列管理算法性能评价
因此,拥塞会降低网络性能。本文评价了几种用于控制拥塞的主动队列管理(AQM)算法。本文的主要目标是找到可用于避免拥塞的最优算法。AQM是一种基于路由器的机制,它可以在网络的早期检测到拥塞,要求发送方降低传输速率,从而控制传入数据包的拥塞。本文通过对几种AQM算法的性能分析,对几种AQM算法进行了评价,选取的AQM算法有:Gentle BLUE (GB)算法、Dynamic Gentle Random Early Detection (DGRED)算法、Effective Random Early Detection (ERED)算法、BLUE算法和Adaptive Max Threshold算法。利用JAVA仿真环境进行性能评估。评估结果表明,与DGRED、ERED、BLUE和Adaptive Max Threshold算法相比,GB算法在平均队列长度、延迟和丢包方面表现优于DGRED算法。与DGRED、ERED、BLUE和Adaptive Max Threshold相比,GB具有最大的掉落概率。在吞吐量方面,所有被测试的算法都给出了相同的吞吐量。结果表明,与DGRED、ERED、BLUE和Adaptive Max Threshold算法相比,GB is算法是一种较好的拥塞处理算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating patterns of emotion and expressions using smart learning spaces A Secure Collaborative Module on Distributed SDN RecDNNing: a recommender system using deep neural network with user and item embeddings Scheduling Different Types of Bag-of-Tasks Jobs in Distributed Systems Does Privacy Matters When We are Sick? An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for Healthcare Technology Adoption Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1