Testing Estimator's Credibility - Part II: Other Tests*

X. R. Li, Zhanlue Zhao
{"title":"Testing Estimator's Credibility - Part II: Other Tests*","authors":"X. R. Li, Zhanlue Zhao","doi":"10.1109/ICIF.2006.301740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For pt.I see ibid., p.Z001330-7 (2006). Many estimators and filters provide assessments of their own estimation error. Are these self-assessments trustable? What is the degree to which they are trustable? This is Part II of a two-part series that provides answers to some of these questions, referred to as the credibility of the estimators. It proposes several tests for credibility and a test-based solution to the problem of comparing estimators' credibility. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the utility and effectiveness of the proposed tests","PeriodicalId":248061,"journal":{"name":"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2006.301740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

For pt.I see ibid., p.Z001330-7 (2006). Many estimators and filters provide assessments of their own estimation error. Are these self-assessments trustable? What is the degree to which they are trustable? This is Part II of a two-part series that provides answers to some of these questions, referred to as the credibility of the estimators. It proposes several tests for credibility and a test-based solution to the problem of comparing estimators' credibility. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the utility and effectiveness of the proposed tests
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估员可信度测试-第二部分:其他测试*
参见同上,p.Z001330-7(2006)。许多估计器和过滤器提供了它们自己的估计误差的评估。这些自我评估可信吗?他们在多大程度上是值得信任的?本文是由两部分组成的系列文章的第2部分,该系列文章提供了其中一些问题的答案,这些问题被称为估算器的可信度。提出了几种可信性测试方法,并提出了一种基于测试的估计器可信性比较问题的解决方案。数值算例说明了所提出的测试方法的实用性和有效性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced Tracking Performance with Signal Amplitude Information of Sensor Networks The Dynamics of Information Fusion: Synthesis Versus Misassociation Efficient Track-to-Task Assignment Using Cluster Analysis Scanpath Analysis of Fused Multi-Sensor Images with Luminance Change: A Pilot Study A Model for a Human Decision-Maker in a Command and Control Radar System: Surveillance Tracking of Multiple Targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1