Intertemporal Uncertainty Avoidance: When the Future is Uncertain, People Prefer the Present, and When the Present is Uncertain, People Prefer the Future

David J. Hardisty, J. Pfeffer
{"title":"Intertemporal Uncertainty Avoidance: When the Future is Uncertain, People Prefer the Present, and When the Present is Uncertain, People Prefer the Future","authors":"David J. Hardisty, J. Pfeffer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2656662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three studies explored the effects of uncertainty on people’s time preferences for financial gains and losses. In general, individuals seek to avoid uncertainty in situations of intertemporal choice. While holding the expected value of payouts constant, participants preferred immediate gains and losses if the future was uncertain, and preferred future gains and losses if the present was uncertain. This pattern of preferences is incompatible with current models of intertemporal choice, in which people should consistently prefer to have gains now and losses later. This pattern of uncertainty avoidance is also not explained by prospect theory models, which predict risk seeking for losses. We discuss these findings in relation to previous literature. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, judgment and decision making.","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2656662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Three studies explored the effects of uncertainty on people’s time preferences for financial gains and losses. In general, individuals seek to avoid uncertainty in situations of intertemporal choice. While holding the expected value of payouts constant, participants preferred immediate gains and losses if the future was uncertain, and preferred future gains and losses if the present was uncertain. This pattern of preferences is incompatible with current models of intertemporal choice, in which people should consistently prefer to have gains now and losses later. This pattern of uncertainty avoidance is also not explained by prospect theory models, which predict risk seeking for losses. We discuss these findings in relation to previous literature. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349. This paper was accepted by Yuval Rottenstreich, judgment and decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨期不确定性规避:当未来不确定时,人们更喜欢现在,当现在不确定时,人们更喜欢未来
三项研究探讨了不确定性对人们对经济收益和损失的时间偏好的影响。一般来说,个体在跨期选择的情况下寻求避免不确定性。在保持支付的期望值不变的情况下,如果未来不确定,参与者更喜欢即时的收益和损失;如果现在不确定,参与者更喜欢未来的收益和损失。这种偏好模式与当前的跨期选择模式是不相容的,在跨期选择模式中,人们应该始终倾向于先得后失。这种不确定性规避模式也不能用前景理论模型来解释,前景理论模型预测风险寻求损失。我们将这些发现与以前的文献进行讨论。作为补充资料的数据可在http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349上获得。这篇论文被Yuval Rottenstreich接受,判断和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived Job Risk and Dark CRM: Heightened Role of Perceived Job Insecurity & Fear of COVID-19 Two-stage Budgeting with Bounded Rationality How Consumers' Personality Traits Affect Their Buying Intensity in Sale Promotion Activities: The Mediatory Role of Buying Behavior Contracts in the Age of Smart Readers The Effect of Satisfaction, and Brand Image on Consumer Purchase: The Role of National Culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1