British Criminological Amnesia: Making the Case for a Black and Postcolonial Feminist Criminology

C. Choak
{"title":"British Criminological Amnesia: Making the Case for a Black and Postcolonial Feminist Criminology","authors":"C. Choak","doi":"10.24135/dcj.v2i1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discipline of Western criminology emerged during the colonial era as a means of controlling the ‘other’. Despite its failures in terms of recidivism these perspectives have been adopted on a global scale. Crime and punishment have been heavily influenced by these ideas and continue to reproduce them in relation to problematic, and pathologising, discourses such as the UK gang agenda which positions young black men as naturally aggressive, sexual predators and innately criminal. How criminologists carry out research also demands attention through a decolonial lens. A move towards a British postcolonial criminology has received scant attention despite there being a range of global literature which calls for changes to be made to the roots of the discipline. Similarly, feminist criminology in Britain has barely been touched by ideas of black and postcolonial feminisms. Consequently, drawing on what has written to further the cause of a black feminist criminology (BFC), this paper argues for the adoption of a black and postcolonial feminist criminology (BPFC) in the UK whereby issues of race, intersectionality and decolonial baggage are central to how we understand crime. \n ","PeriodicalId":136185,"journal":{"name":"Decolonization of Criminology and Justice","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decolonization of Criminology and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/dcj.v2i1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The discipline of Western criminology emerged during the colonial era as a means of controlling the ‘other’. Despite its failures in terms of recidivism these perspectives have been adopted on a global scale. Crime and punishment have been heavily influenced by these ideas and continue to reproduce them in relation to problematic, and pathologising, discourses such as the UK gang agenda which positions young black men as naturally aggressive, sexual predators and innately criminal. How criminologists carry out research also demands attention through a decolonial lens. A move towards a British postcolonial criminology has received scant attention despite there being a range of global literature which calls for changes to be made to the roots of the discipline. Similarly, feminist criminology in Britain has barely been touched by ideas of black and postcolonial feminisms. Consequently, drawing on what has written to further the cause of a black feminist criminology (BFC), this paper argues for the adoption of a black and postcolonial feminist criminology (BPFC) in the UK whereby issues of race, intersectionality and decolonial baggage are central to how we understand crime.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国犯罪学失忆:为黑人和后殖民女性主义犯罪学辩护
西方犯罪学在殖民时期作为控制“他者”的一种手段而出现。尽管它在累犯方面失败了,但这些观点已在全球范围内被采用。犯罪和惩罚受到这些思想的严重影响,并在与问题和病态相关的话语中继续复制它们,例如英国帮派议程,将年轻的黑人男性定位为天生的侵略性,性掠夺者和天生的罪犯。犯罪学家如何开展研究也需要通过非殖民化的镜头来关注。尽管有一系列全球文献呼吁改变这一学科的根源,但英国后殖民犯罪学的发展却很少受到关注。同样,英国的女性主义犯罪学几乎没有受到黑人和后殖民女性主义思想的影响。因此,在进一步发展黑人女性主义犯罪学(BFC)的基础上,本文主张在英国采用黑人和后殖民女性主义犯罪学(BPFC),即种族、交叉性和非殖民化的包袱问题是我们如何理解犯罪的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Zealand’s Coalition Government Gang Policy and the Death of Evidence Editorial 6(1) Australia’s Regime of Bikie Legislation The Whakapapa of the ‘Patch’: He Korowai Tēnei Racial Profiling, Australian Criminology and the Creation of Statistical ‘Facts’: A Response to Shepherd and Spivak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1