Foreword: Law as...III - Glossolalia: Toward a Minor (Historical) Jurisprudence

C. Tomlins
{"title":"Foreword: Law as...III - Glossolalia: Toward a Minor (Historical) Jurisprudence","authors":"C. Tomlins","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2545900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper serves as foreword and introduction to the third collection of essays produced under the auspices of the biennial “Law As …” conference, held at the University of California Irvine School of Law. The third conference took place in March 2014; the essays presented there are be published in a symposium issue of the U.C. Irvine Law Review in 2015. Following on from the first (April 2010) and second (March 2012) conferences, the third further develops the distinctive trajectory of “Law As …” as a mode of legal study situated at the intersection of law, the humanities, and the social sciences. Each of the three conferences, and resulting collections of articles [see 1 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 519 (2011), and 4 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 1 (2014), has had its own distinctive character, but on each occasion the intent has been to engage in a double move: to deploy history as an interpretive practice – a theory, a methodology, a philosophy – with which to engage law; and simultaneously to offer history as a substantive arena in which other interpretive practices from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences can undertake their own engagement with law. The result is a multi-year work in progress that has arced in the direction of locating “Law As …” in the realm of jurisprudence. As this introduction explains, that tendency is rendered explicit in the latest collection, which embraces the distinctive template of \"minor jurisprudence.\"","PeriodicalId":326558,"journal":{"name":"UC Irvine law review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UC Irvine law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2545900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper serves as foreword and introduction to the third collection of essays produced under the auspices of the biennial “Law As …” conference, held at the University of California Irvine School of Law. The third conference took place in March 2014; the essays presented there are be published in a symposium issue of the U.C. Irvine Law Review in 2015. Following on from the first (April 2010) and second (March 2012) conferences, the third further develops the distinctive trajectory of “Law As …” as a mode of legal study situated at the intersection of law, the humanities, and the social sciences. Each of the three conferences, and resulting collections of articles [see 1 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 519 (2011), and 4 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 1 (2014), has had its own distinctive character, but on each occasion the intent has been to engage in a double move: to deploy history as an interpretive practice – a theory, a methodology, a philosophy – with which to engage law; and simultaneously to offer history as a substantive arena in which other interpretive practices from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences can undertake their own engagement with law. The result is a multi-year work in progress that has arced in the direction of locating “Law As …” in the realm of jurisprudence. As this introduction explains, that tendency is rendered explicit in the latest collection, which embraces the distinctive template of "minor jurisprudence."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前言:法律作为……三-词汇:走向次要(历史)法理学
本文是加州大学欧文分校法学院主办的两年一次的“法律作为……”会议的第三部论文集的前言和引言。第三次会议于2014年3月举行;在那里提交的论文将发表在2015年《加州大学欧文分校法律评论》的研讨会上。继第一届(2010年4月)和第二届(2012年3月)会议之后,第三届会议进一步发展了“法律作为……”的独特轨迹,作为一种位于法学、人文科学和社会科学交叉点的法律研究模式。三次会议中的每一次,以及由此产生的文章集(见1 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 519(2011)和4 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 1(2014)),都有自己独特的特点,但每次会议的目的都是进行双重行动:将历史作为一种解释实践——一种理论、一种方法论、一种哲学——来参与法律;同时,将历史作为一个实质性的舞台,在这个舞台上,来自广泛的人文和社会科学领域的其他解释实践可以与法律进行自己的接触。其结果是一项多年来正在进行的工作,其方向是将“法律作为……”定位在法理学领域。正如本引言所解释的那样,这种趋势在最新的合集中得到了明确体现,它包含了独特的“小法学”模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Identification to Identity Theft: Public Perceptions of Biometric Privacy Harms Star Athletica and the Problem of Panaestheticism FARC Justice: Rebel Rule of Law Collateral Damage: A Public Housing Consequence of the "War on Drugs" A New Approach to Voir Dire on Racial Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1