Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Comparison Between a Cooling Tower and a Geothermal Heat Exchanger for Air Conditioning Applications in Ecuador

F. Porras, Angel D. Ramirez, A. Walter, Guillermo Soriano
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Comparison Between a Cooling Tower and a Geothermal Heat Exchanger for Air Conditioning Applications in Ecuador","authors":"F. Porras, Angel D. Ramirez, A. Walter, Guillermo Soriano","doi":"10.1115/es2019-3907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cooling towers are widely used to remove heat in buildings with chilled water air conditioning systems. Moreira et al. [1] performed an experimental comparison between a cooling tower (CT) and a geothermal heat exchanger (GHE) in Guayaquil-Ecuador (hot/humid climate) and the results show an advantage of 39% of GHE systems regarding energy efficiency.\n This study compares the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), considering the results of the research mentioned above and comparing both systems. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to estimate the GHG emissions, assuming three scenarios for the electricity supply: the electricity generation mix in 2016, the planned electricity generation mix in 2025, and the profile for marginal electricity generation (peak demand).\n The estimated reduction of GHG emissions due to the use of GHE systems could be up to 50%. GHEs for building air conditioning applications is a technological option with potential to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions. However, additional work is necessary to evaluate the complete environmental profile and its cost-effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":219138,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2019-3907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cooling towers are widely used to remove heat in buildings with chilled water air conditioning systems. Moreira et al. [1] performed an experimental comparison between a cooling tower (CT) and a geothermal heat exchanger (GHE) in Guayaquil-Ecuador (hot/humid climate) and the results show an advantage of 39% of GHE systems regarding energy efficiency. This study compares the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), considering the results of the research mentioned above and comparing both systems. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to estimate the GHG emissions, assuming three scenarios for the electricity supply: the electricity generation mix in 2016, the planned electricity generation mix in 2025, and the profile for marginal electricity generation (peak demand). The estimated reduction of GHG emissions due to the use of GHE systems could be up to 50%. GHEs for building air conditioning applications is a technological option with potential to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions. However, additional work is necessary to evaluate the complete environmental profile and its cost-effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
温室气体排放的生命周期评估:厄瓜多尔空调应用冷却塔和地热热交换器的比较
冷却塔被广泛用于具有冷冻水空调系统的建筑物的散热。Moreira等人[1]在瓜亚基尔-厄瓜多尔(炎热/潮湿气候)对冷却塔(CT)和地热换热器(GHE)进行了实验比较,结果显示GHE系统在能源效率方面具有39%的优势。考虑到上述研究的结果,本研究比较了两个系统的温室气体(GHG)排放。使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法估算了温室气体排放,假设了三种电力供应情景:2016年的发电组合、2025年的计划发电组合和边际发电(峰值需求)的概况。由于使用GHE系统,估计减少的温室气体排放量可达50%。温室气体用于建筑空调是一种有潜力减少能源消耗和温室气体排放的技术选择。然而,需要进一步的工作来评价完整的环境概况及其成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building Stock Inertia and Impacts on Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Qatar Optimization of Storage Bin Geometry for High Temperature Particle-Based CSP Systems Clean Energy From Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Comparative Studies on the Effect of Selected Iron-Based Additives on Anaerobic Digestion of Okra Waste Development of a Cascade Elastocaloric Regenerator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1