The Uniparental Genetic Landscape of Modern Slavic Speaking Populations

S. Karachanak-Yankova, D. Nesheva, D. Toncheva, A. Galabov
{"title":"The Uniparental Genetic Landscape of Modern Slavic Speaking Populations","authors":"S. Karachanak-Yankova, D. Nesheva, D. Toncheva, A. Galabov","doi":"10.4236/AA.2017.74018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Slavic speaking populations are the most numerous Indo-European ethnolinguistic group in Europe. They show great variety and fall into three groups: West, East and South Slavic populations. In order to contribute to the understanding of the correlation between linguistic and genetic affiliation of Slavic populations, we have analyzed for the first time their matrilineal and patrilineal relationships and we have also illustrated their position in the European uniparental genetic landscape. For the purpose, we have collected previously published data for the frequencies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome haplogroups in Slavic and other European populations and compared them by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). In the inter-Slavic population comparisons, West and East Slavs are in a closer position, whereas South Slavic populations are rather grouped on their own. In the European context, South Slavic populations are positioned more close to neighboring Balkan non-Slavic and North Italian populations, than to other Slavic populations. When considering the uniparental diversity of Slavic speaking populations, one should also take into account the prevalence of Y-chromosome haplogroup N among East Slavs (comprising almost half of the paternal gene pool in instances), which is almost absent among the other groups (not exceeding 2% - 3%). In conclusion, the data in the present study point that West-East and South Slavic speaking populations, behave as separate groups based on their uniparental genetic structure, which shows that they do not share substantial common genetic ancestry and that there is great genetic variety in the Slavic linguistic unity.","PeriodicalId":149660,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Anthropology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/AA.2017.74018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Slavic speaking populations are the most numerous Indo-European ethnolinguistic group in Europe. They show great variety and fall into three groups: West, East and South Slavic populations. In order to contribute to the understanding of the correlation between linguistic and genetic affiliation of Slavic populations, we have analyzed for the first time their matrilineal and patrilineal relationships and we have also illustrated their position in the European uniparental genetic landscape. For the purpose, we have collected previously published data for the frequencies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome haplogroups in Slavic and other European populations and compared them by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). In the inter-Slavic population comparisons, West and East Slavs are in a closer position, whereas South Slavic populations are rather grouped on their own. In the European context, South Slavic populations are positioned more close to neighboring Balkan non-Slavic and North Italian populations, than to other Slavic populations. When considering the uniparental diversity of Slavic speaking populations, one should also take into account the prevalence of Y-chromosome haplogroup N among East Slavs (comprising almost half of the paternal gene pool in instances), which is almost absent among the other groups (not exceeding 2% - 3%). In conclusion, the data in the present study point that West-East and South Slavic speaking populations, behave as separate groups based on their uniparental genetic structure, which shows that they do not share substantial common genetic ancestry and that there is great genetic variety in the Slavic linguistic unity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代斯拉夫语人口的单代遗传景观
说斯拉夫语的人口是欧洲数量最多的印欧民族语言群体。他们表现出很大的多样性,分为三组:西斯拉夫人,东斯拉夫人和南斯拉夫人。为了有助于理解斯拉夫人口的语言和遗传关系之间的相关性,我们首次分析了他们的母系和父系关系,我们也说明了他们在欧洲单亲遗传景观中的地位。为此,我们收集了斯拉夫和其他欧洲人群中线粒体DNA (mtDNA)和y染色体单倍群频率的先前发表的数据,并通过主成分分析(PCA)对它们进行了比较。在斯拉夫人之间的人口比较中,西斯拉夫人和东斯拉夫人处于更接近的位置,而南斯拉夫人则是各自为伍。在欧洲的背景下,南斯拉夫人口的位置更接近邻近的巴尔干非斯拉夫和北意大利人口,而不是其他斯拉夫人口。当考虑到斯拉夫语系人群的单亲多样性时,人们还应该考虑到y染色体单倍群N在东斯拉夫人中的流行(在某些情况下,几乎占父系基因库的一半),而在其他群体中几乎不存在(不超过2% - 3%)。综上所述,本研究的数据表明,西、东、南斯拉夫语系的人群在其单代遗传结构的基础上表现为不同的群体,这表明他们没有大量共同的遗传祖先,在斯拉夫语言统一中存在着巨大的遗传多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cooperative and Problem-Based Learning Practice in Islamic Education in Bahrain: Strengths and Challenges The Engraved Pebble from Pavlo-Ochakovskaya Spit Critics of Delegation and Decentralization in Abdicating Authority and Upholding Ubuntu Philosophy in Social Welfare Organizations Archaeology of Human Consciousness: An Integrated Narrative of Cognitive Evolution from the Preanthromorphic Mind to Humanity’s Contemporary, Academia-Centric Culture Ayotzinapa 43: The Political Aesthetics of Drone Protest Graffiti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1