Towards an Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in Bangladesh.

Hossain Ahmed Taufiq
{"title":"Towards an Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in Bangladesh.","authors":"Hossain Ahmed Taufiq","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3891781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social accountability refers to promoting good governance by making ruling elites more responsive. In Bangladesh, where bureaucracy and legislature operate with little effective accountability or checks and balances, traditional horizontal or vertical accountability proved to be very blunt and weak. In the presence of such faulty mechanisms, ordinary citizen’s access to information is frequently denied, and their voices are kept mute. It impasses the formation of an enabling environment, where activists and civil society institutions representing the ordinary people’s interest are actively discouraged. They become vulnerable to retribution. Social accountability, on the other hand, provides an enabling environment for activists and civil society institutions to operate freely. Thus, leaders and administration become more accountable to people. An enabling environment means providing legal protection, enhancing the availability of information and increasing citizen voice, strengthening institutional and public service capacities and directing incentives that foster accountability. Donors allocate significant shares of resources to encouraging civil society to partner with elites rather than holding them accountable. This paper advocate for a stronger legal environment to protect critical civil society and whistle-blowers, and for independent grant-makers tasked with building strong, self-regulating social accountability institutions.","PeriodicalId":175326,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social accountability refers to promoting good governance by making ruling elites more responsive. In Bangladesh, where bureaucracy and legislature operate with little effective accountability or checks and balances, traditional horizontal or vertical accountability proved to be very blunt and weak. In the presence of such faulty mechanisms, ordinary citizen’s access to information is frequently denied, and their voices are kept mute. It impasses the formation of an enabling environment, where activists and civil society institutions representing the ordinary people’s interest are actively discouraged. They become vulnerable to retribution. Social accountability, on the other hand, provides an enabling environment for activists and civil society institutions to operate freely. Thus, leaders and administration become more accountable to people. An enabling environment means providing legal protection, enhancing the availability of information and increasing citizen voice, strengthening institutional and public service capacities and directing incentives that foster accountability. Donors allocate significant shares of resources to encouraging civil society to partner with elites rather than holding them accountable. This paper advocate for a stronger legal environment to protect critical civil society and whistle-blowers, and for independent grant-makers tasked with building strong, self-regulating social accountability institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为孟加拉国的社会问责制创造有利环境。
社会责任指的是通过让统治精英更负责任来促进善治。在孟加拉国,官僚机构和立法机构的运作几乎没有有效的问责制或制衡,传统的横向或纵向问责制证明是非常生硬和薄弱的。在这种有缺陷的机制存在的情况下,普通公民获取信息的机会经常被剥夺,他们的声音被噤声。它阻碍了有利环境的形成,使代表普通民众利益的活动人士和民间社会机构受到积极劝阻。他们很容易受到惩罚。另一方面,社会问责制为活动人士和民间社会机构的自由运作提供了有利的环境。因此,领导人和行政部门对人民更加负责。有利的环境意味着提供法律保护,提高信息的可得性,增加公民的声音,加强机构和公共服务能力,并指导促进问责制的激励措施。捐助者将大量资源用于鼓励民间社会与精英合作,而不是追究他们的责任。本文主张建立一个更强有力的法律环境,以保护持批评态度的公民社会和举报人,并支持独立的拨款机构负责建立强大的、自我监管的社会问责机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between sustainability, purpose, and resilience in the context of corporations: a conceptual framework Reforming the International Monetary Fund’s Debt Sustainability Assessments towards Achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Crucial Post-Pandemic Recovery Agenda La democracia ambiental y el Acuerdo de Escazú en Colombia a partir de la Constitución Ecológica de 1991 (Environmental Democracy and the Escazu Agreement in Colombia since the Ecological Constitution of 1991) Implementing Sustainable Development Goals in India: Progress So far The Effects of Neighboring Parties on the Value of Rights: Evidence from Timber Harvests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1